I would think most villains were combinations of either BC influence or Nemesis, but they're not the same thing. It's two groups both thinking that they're using the other one for their own gains. Sells/Kravos/Bianca are all the initial pawns set up by the BC, not really Nemesis hosts. Why waste a limited slot on someone like Sells if you're Nemesis when the BC will control him for you?
SA?
Ariana doesn't make sense to me. She'd be a nice candidate as far as her placement in the Red Court, but she doesn't undermine anything like normal Nemesis hosts. Her moves in Changes were all pro-Red Court when the goal of the bad guys was to weaken both nations by screwing the one that was currently on top in the war. The Red King and Peabody did that for them.
The best connection with Ariana and the BC would be the heart curse that Sells was studying for them. Possibly the BC/Nemesis could have thought that killing starborn Harry and Eb was worth ending their war early.
Yeah, I'm getting the Agent Smith vibe from Nemesis too. My current framework is that Nemesis has a limited list of candidates to jump into and partially to fully control, but it can only do that to a smaller number of beings at once, say 13ish since that number is cropping up a lot more lately.
SA (I'm abbreviating your handle), I believe Lily confirms Sells, Denton, Kravos and Aurora. Why waste Nemesis on Justine? She's just a low-level human. I suspect Justin was too for that matter. I think all these apparent nobody humans are not chosen randomly, but for their specific connection to Harry. Why pick on people just in Chicago? Why pick such weak hosts? I do believe Nemesis also is trying to create more chaos in the world, but the hosts are not totally at random. It could be as simple as the initial host was connected to Harry and Chicago, and so all the others are just the hosts that were available. It could also be much more specific and each host was chosen for how it would affect certain things. I believe that is more likely, considering how powerful Outsiders are and Walkers in particular.
I agree though there is a difference between Nemesis infected villains, Black Court agents and those manipulated by them, and other nasty monsters. I think Arianna WAS destabilising the Red Court, she just didn't realise it. Think back to Maeve. So sure she was winning her own game against Mab - neither knowing nor caring for the repercussions. Maeve was almost deluded into believing she would rule instead of Mab but really she would have perished along with the rest. I think Arianna was blinded to her ambitions of going to the Lords of the Outer Night...never realising that the end result of her manipulations was going to be either the destruction of the Red Court or the Wizards. Neither matters to Nemesis...it just wants Empty Night. Remember how the it says everything that happened in Battle Ground was just an act of faith in "Empty Night"?
Well, it's almost certain whoever gave the that curse to Sells (some really advanced dark magic, blood magic) also either taught it to the Red Court, or borrowed it from them to pass on. We've always assumed Black Court...but Nemesis could be the link as well. I don't know that Sells could have powered the curse past one individual.
You know, I first thought of Agent Smith but then the more I thought about it the less it works. Agent Smith wanted to "perfect" everything. He hated all the humans, and then all the programs as well. He almost grew too powerful for his masters to control (at least, that's one interpretation). But Smith ended up taking over every program in the Matrix. He couldn't stop, becoming a self-replicating virus. Smith wasn't just one thing, it was a legion by the end. Which I think was deliberate by the Wachowskis. Anyway, Nemesis doesn't seem to take everything over or be a legion, as such. It more seems like a being that just enjoys destroying things, and just take's over it's host when it feels the need to. That's why I thought of it more of the regular Agents than Smith. Still though, anything is possible.
I'm trying to figure out in my head using book evidence if the contagion *has* to be Beside. I'd prefer if it didn't.
I'd prefer if the contagion is a conduit that corrupts those it touches, changing them, but it doesn't have anything to do with Beside.
The question is, if the contagion in last call tied the beer drinkers to the essence of Dionysus, then could the nemesis contagion tie to the Lord of Slowest Terror, master of the Walkers?
It could be that the contagion is a psychic link, and the link causes behavior corruption without Beside being involved.
Beside could just be using the link to spy on some, and possess a select few that meet additional criteria.
That's an interesting question. I'm not sure it
has to be Beside...but I'm not sure that it's anything else either. The Lord of Slowest Terror is an interesting connection. Although one could argue that just as Dionysus was connected to the drinkers of Mac's beer via the contagion, Nemesis
is the contagion that connects those infected with the being that it serves (likely an Old One) - the Lord of Slowest Terror. Or Nemesis could be the being at the end of the electricity cable, so to speak, rather than being the cable itself. It's really hard to say.
I'd personally link this to the summoning and mirroring conversation in PG. Based on previous theory combined with BG Nemesis I'd place a large wager that those things connected to either side of the love, faith, and hope trio are primary vectors for contagion. Molly in particular is a candidate for being infected through the use of fear against free will, and in doing so opened herself up to whatever mouse caught a wiff of outside the station. I can also make the case for Nemesis intentionally targeting young, potentially magical women with a propensity to go insane for one reason or another. Molly, Archive, Maeve, Justine. Me thinks Nemesis takes after her namesake and is inherently female.
*And... Is not black magic/contagion simply the primary conduit?
So, what about the male victims? Cat Sith, Kravos, Denton, Sells, likely Cowl, likely Justin, possibly Peabody etc. Lea also isn't young nor is Maeve. Has the Archive been infected? Hard to see Nemesis being gender focused. Can an extradimensional entity from beyond reality have a gender? That's like trying to gender gravity I would have thought.
I don't believe black magic could be the primary conduit though, even if it's part of the process. Justine doesn't practice magic for a start, and beings like Lord Raith etc have inhuman magic. Their dark magic is different from human black magic. The difference between what Cowl uses versus what Mavra uses is distinct. The Faeries use Faerie magic, which doesn't seem to have a black-white magic dichotomy. So how would they be tainted from black magic use?
Eh ... I wouldn't take Lily's list as authoritative. She was extensively misled.
There was a WOJ that the first nemfected character appeared 'on stage' in Grave Peril, so I think Sells is in the influenced but not infected category. I'm still uncertain whether he was talking about on the literal stage with Bianca at the party scene, or just on page in a general sense.
That's fair, Lily didn't know a lot of things. I do remember though back before Justine was revealed as a host for Beside, that people used to claim Lily being misled as a reason for mortals to not be able to be nemfected/possessed...which clearly turned out to not be the case. So I am not so sure we should be so quick to write off what she said. Not to mention, the Doylist reason for listing those characters is to inform the reader. It's not particularly smooth, but unless Jim is deliberately trying to mislead readers about those mentioned in Lily's list it doesn't actually make sense to list them in the first place. I get he was trying to mislead the readers at that moment about Maeve and Lily (Maeve in particular) but in a broader sense what does misleading readers about whether Denton or Sells were infected/possessed achieve?
Also, side note that just occurred to me - Titania would have known Maeve was infected but deliberately chose to let the events of Cold Days play out. Mab has the right to be fairly angry at her not to mention her inaction led to Lily's death. Either Titania is really mad at Mab (seems likely) or she was immensely short-sighted (also possible).
To play devil's advocate as well - Jim has said many things in interviews that aren't true because he sometimes misremembers his own work (particularly the older stuff). Sometimes the questioners even have to remind him. I admit I am unfamiliar with the WOJ in question, but it's possible (depending on when the WOJ was made) that Jim hadn't yet written Cold Days or could well have forgotten what he wrote in Cold Days.
See, this is where the terminology is limiting.
If there's a contagion that corrupts, and there's Beside possession, then what he said and what Lily said can both be accurate.
Sells end Denton are infected with the corrupting contagion. Someone in GP is possessed/hosting Beside/Nemesis.
That's a very good point. We certainly, at least for theory crafting, need better rules around terminology. It would be helpful if Jim did it himself because then the fandom would shift. But I doubt he will because it keeps us guessing more.
Next AMA, someone should really try and clarify this stuff.