Poll

Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?

Mavra
33 (24.3%)
Cowl
25 (18.4%)
Kumori
11 (8.1%)
Lara Raith
37 (27.2%)
Lord Raith
23 (16.9%)
The Eebs
7 (5.1%)

Total Members Voted: 57

Author Topic: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?  (Read 36924 times)

Offline Mr. Death

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 7965
  • Not all those who wander are lost
    • View Profile
    • The C-Team Podcast
Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
« Reply #90 on: September 12, 2017, 02:12:59 PM »
Mab doesn't seem like the type to write in a provision letting the losers get payback for losing a war they started, with a weapon they created themselves.

Mab, to me, seems much more likely to include language in the Accords to the effect of, "You brought it on yourselves."
Compels solve everything!

http://blur.by/1KgqJg6 My first book: "Brothers of the Curled Isles"

Quote from: Cozarkian
Not every word JB rights is a conspiracy. Sometimes, he's just telling a story.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_T_mld7Acnm-0FVUiaKDPA The C-Team Podcast

Offline Griffyn612

  • The Merlin
  • Seriously?
  • *******
  • Posts: 11725
    • View Profile
Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
« Reply #91 on: September 12, 2017, 03:29:27 PM »
First, that's a pretty big assumption.
From a Doylist perspective, there's not much point in bringing the Eebs back unless you're establishing that the Ramps are still going to be around.  Therefore, them surviving and them being able to reproduce are part of the whole. 

Quote
As for them being more powerful... eh, I'm not totally sold on that. They have a few crippling and -- most importantly -- well-known weaknesses that let pre-infection Susan take a few of them out.
It's said in the books that the Wamps are inferior to the other vampires, strength and speed-wise.  As for Susan, I think that's a stretch.  Pre-bite, she used holy water and a gun to likely kill one.  She helped the others keep some at bay.  That's all that said about that. 

Considering that they were obviously trying to take Susan and Justine alive (because they did) it changes the dynamic of the fight.  They weren't going for the kill.

Quote
Truth is we don't know what all their servitors can do. Having minions that don't have glaring weaknesses or an addiction to blood might be worth the trade-off of power.
I'm willing to bet there's some that are more formidable.  But as general shock troops, do you think the ones we saw so far would be better than Ramps?  Short of taking out their blood bladder, Ramps are hard to take out.  The servitors so far fell like chaff.

Quote
If there were more than the two most cowardly examples of the species, I'd agree with you more.
I think your definition of cowardly is odd.  Staying alive to complete your mission is an interesting take on cowardice.

And if Harry hadn't had the get-out-of-paralysis-free card to play, they would have won. He had to sell his proverbial soul to overcome their machinations.

Quote
Think of it this way, though. Let's say they show up in Peace Talks on official business. Harry knows where they were last seen. He's on speaking terms with the guy who had them. You don't think he's going to ask? You don't think everyone else -- like the White Council contingent -- is going to notice that the Fomor had been allied with a group that had so recently tried to genocide them?

The Fomor or Nemesis would have to show a few of their holding cards to get them out and keep them out. I don't think it's worth it.
I already provided two examples of how that could go down.  One is that the Erlking lets them go to preserve a hunter species.  The other is that the traitor has them freed and frames someone else that won't be around to answer questions.  Some minor Lord of the Court is convinced to do it, and is then betrayed by the spy and knocked off. 

Erlking is left with suspicions, but nothing to work with.  And if he wasn't already keeping a suspicious eye on his people, given all the infiltration lately among the Sidhe Courts, he's an idiot.

What if they're planning to use the peace talks to demand restitution for, you know, genocide?
Mab doesn't seem like the type to write in a provision letting the losers get payback for losing a war they started, with a weapon they created themselves.

Mab, to me, seems much more likely to include language in the Accords to the effect of, "You brought it on yourselves."
I concur that restitution is unlikely.  They could arrive as part of the Fomor party, or they could arrive as survivors that are looking to get some minor Accords protection as they re-establish their Court, conceding that they're done with war and revenge.  Until they're not.

Offline Kindler

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 1139
    • View Profile
Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
« Reply #92 on: September 12, 2017, 05:38:51 PM »
Mab doesn't seem like the type to write in a provision letting the losers get payback for losing a war they started, with a weapon they created themselves.

Mab, to me, seems much more likely to include language in the Accords to the effect of, "You brought it on yourselves."

I concur that restitution is unlikely.  They could arrive as part of the Fomor party, or they could arrive as survivors that are looking to get some minor Accords protection as they re-establish their Court, conceding that they're done with war and revenge.  Until they're not.

I was thinking more that the Fomor would use the Eebs, as the only surviving members of the Reds, as political levers. Consider what fining the White Council a weregild for each member of the Red Court Harry killed as a result of the curse would cost. Harry did point out that the economic power of the White Council was one of their most effective weapons. This could bankrupt them, even if Harry doesn't personally have to pay for it. Though it would be kind of funny if he had to immediately lose all of the diamonds he just acquired from Skin Game because of a supernatural legal case.

Does Mab actually get the final say? I think she might, but I think the other signatories' opinions might matter. I'm not really disagreeing, I'm just unsure what the arbitration process is for the Accords. Is there a vote? A jury trial, or an opportunity to one? Is Mab essentially the Supreme Court?

Anyway, my overall idea wasn't that the Eebs would press a claim, but that the Fomor, if they had them smuggled out, might use them as witnesses to level charges at Harry, the White Council, and Winter. Think about all of the Reds that (being monsters aside) were minding their own business in Paris or Athens when their hearts exploded out of their chests. Ditto to all of the half-turned ones who died; the same argument for claiming the ladies of the Ordo and the lesser talents as part of the White Council's legitimate interests (which allowed Harry and Ramirez to challenge the whites to a duel) could be made of them, and they never necessarily committed murder. Countless within the Reds' sphere of influence who had absolutely nothing to do with the bloodline curse were killed because of the assault on Buffalo Chicken Pizza.

Super unlikely, sure, but I'm not a lawyer and I could make those arguments, and sympathizers and appeasers like Cristos could sway opinions enough for it to have a real impact. I think it would actually be pretty interesting if that happened, if for no other reason than the Eebs were pathetic excuses for villains, and their affect on global politics in the supernatural community could be way, way out of proportion with their abilities and actual contributions.

Offline Mr. Death

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 7965
  • Not all those who wander are lost
    • View Profile
    • The C-Team Podcast
Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
« Reply #93 on: September 12, 2017, 06:45:26 PM »
Weregild is to avoid further conflict, and avoid starting a war.

The White Council was already at war with the Red Court. They wouldn't pay weregild for any of the enemy combatants killed.

The war's over and the Red Court lost. That's basically the end of it. It doesn't make sense to then have some kind of charges pressed against the White Council for winning it.
Compels solve everything!

http://blur.by/1KgqJg6 My first book: "Brothers of the Curled Isles"

Quote from: Cozarkian
Not every word JB rights is a conspiracy. Sometimes, he's just telling a story.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_T_mld7Acnm-0FVUiaKDPA The C-Team Podcast

Offline groinkick

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 7556
  • Strike first. Strike Hard. No Mercy! - Cobra Kai
    • View Profile
Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
« Reply #94 on: September 12, 2017, 07:16:35 PM »
Is there WOJ that Lord Raith is going to die or is that a rumor/speculation?

Well I think that the belief is that most in the White Court knows Raith is a puppet now.  Not sure if there is a woj.  Thomas is going to play a big role in the story.  If Lord Raith is going to be killed, or die I think this is probably the book for it.
Stole this from Reginald because it was so well put, and is true for me as well.

"I love this place. It was a beacon in the dark and I couldn't have made it through some of the most maddening years of my life without some great people here."  Thank you Griff and others who took up the torch.

Offline Griffyn612

  • The Merlin
  • Seriously?
  • *******
  • Posts: 11725
    • View Profile
Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
« Reply #95 on: September 12, 2017, 07:51:50 PM »
Or he'll somehow come roaring back into relevance.  Even if Harry doesn't need closure on Lord Raith, Thomas does.  After all, Raith made his life hell, he killed his mother, and he trussed him up as a sacrifice.  There's a showdown owed there.

Offline kazimmoinuddin

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 4366
    • View Profile
Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
« Reply #96 on: September 12, 2017, 10:20:35 PM »
I think there is a theory, that Harry can use his soul fire enhanced magic to truly harm lord Raith. Soul fire has allowed Harry to harm beings that his normal magic can't affect, and has shown proven effectiveness on outsiders, which is where the protections are believed to originate.
 The biggest question is what happens to the death curse Margaret cast. Some believe it would simply disperse, but due to its permanence, I believe more. Even if it disappears, what would the effect on Harry and Thomas if they no longer power a curse.
k moinuddin

Offline dspringer1

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 1075
    • View Profile
Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
« Reply #97 on: September 12, 2017, 11:43:57 PM »
Some more obscure villains for you or a come back from the dead scenario where we did not see the body
1) Ace
2) Red Cap
3) One of the Los Lobos (the woman)
4) Cat Sith
5) That crooked cop who used to be in SI -- R-- something.   
6) The young minion of Nik that switched sides at the end of Skin Game (Maybe not a villain anymore)
7) The young teen that Harry saved in Ghost Story (also not a villain)
8) That assassin of Marcones that was disguised as the scared neighbor of the drug dealer in one of the books
9) The centaur follower of Auora
10) Talos of Auora
11) The guy who stole the temple dogs (never seen)
12) Ebs

Others I am forgetting...

Offline groinkick

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 7556
  • Strike first. Strike Hard. No Mercy! - Cobra Kai
    • View Profile
Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
« Reply #98 on: September 13, 2017, 02:26:35 AM »
Or he'll somehow come roaring back into relevance.  Even if Harry doesn't need closure on Lord Raith, Thomas does.  After all, Raith made his life hell, he killed his mother, and he trussed him up as a sacrifice.  There's a showdown owed there.

I hope he regains full power actually.  To see him be taken down in his current form wouldn't be that satisfying
Stole this from Reginald because it was so well put, and is true for me as well.

"I love this place. It was a beacon in the dark and I couldn't have made it through some of the most maddening years of my life without some great people here."  Thank you Griff and others who took up the torch.

Offline Rasins

  • Seriously?
  • ***
  • Posts: 12188
  • Aid the younger and weaker.
    • View Profile
Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
« Reply #99 on: September 13, 2017, 01:56:18 PM »
Not a villain, but I want to find out what happened to Wizard Montjoy.
At times I wish I had a clone, but then I realize, I could never live with that a-hole.

DV Rasins 2006 BK+++ RP++ JB++++ TH++++ WG+(+?) CL SW++ BC- MC---

Offline Kindler

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 1139
    • View Profile
Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
« Reply #100 on: September 13, 2017, 03:23:06 PM »
Not a villain, but I want to find out what happened to Wizard Montjoy.

He was the one who was down in the Yucatan in Summer Knight, right? A "research trip," if I recall correctly. Which happens to be Chichen Itza's location. I forgot about him until just now. Well, someone had to figure out how to use the leylines and sacrifices to fuel a massive bloodline curse.

Dang it. Jim's making me see Black Council members everywhere.

Offline Rasins

  • Seriously?
  • ***
  • Posts: 12188
  • Aid the younger and weaker.
    • View Profile
Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
« Reply #101 on: September 13, 2017, 05:33:55 PM »
He was the one who was down in the Yucatan in Summer Knight, right? A "research trip," if I recall correctly. Which happens to be Chichen Itza's location. I forgot about him until just now. Well, someone had to figure out how to use the leylines and sacrifices to fuel a massive bloodline curse.

Dang it. Jim's making me see Black Council members everywhere.

I'm hoping for something a bit more ... covert.

Gotta remember that Montjoy was there BEFORE the start of the war (iirc).

I think he was down there "researching" the red court, because he, or someone on the council (Simon?) saw something coming.
At times I wish I had a clone, but then I realize, I could never live with that a-hole.

DV Rasins 2006 BK+++ RP++ JB++++ TH++++ WG+(+?) CL SW++ BC- MC---

Offline Kindler

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 1139
    • View Profile
Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
« Reply #102 on: September 13, 2017, 06:15:07 PM »
I'm hoping for something a bit more ... covert.

Gotta remember that Montjoy was there BEFORE the start of the war (iirc).

I think he was down there "researching" the red court, because he, or someone on the council (Simon?) saw something coming.

I thought of Archangel was the sucker punch the Reds used right as they declared war, like Pearl Harbor; the official declaration of war by Japan wasn't delivered from their embassy until the attack was already underway. I could be way off; I can never seem to remember the details of Summer Knight for some reason. They all seem to kind of flow together.

I'd be into another White Council bigwig (or biggishwig) showing some foresight aside from Eb, Rashid, Joe, and Martha.

Offline RobReece

  • Conversationalist
  • **
  • Posts: 792
    • View Profile
Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
« Reply #103 on: September 13, 2017, 09:47:00 PM »
I thought of Archangel was the sucker punch the Reds used right as they declared war, like Pearl Harbor; the official declaration of war by Japan wasn't delivered from their embassy until the attack was already underway. I could be way off; I can never seem to remember the details of Summer Knight for some reason. They all seem to kind of flow together.

I'd be into another White Council bigwig (or biggishwig) showing some foresight aside from Eb, Rashid, Joe, and Martha.
According to the RCV, the war was initiated by Harry when he killed Bianca and burned her home down, this took place in the Fall.  The attack on Archangel was less than a week before Mid-Summer, roughly nine months later. Archangel was the first big bang, but small actions had already been underway and both sides had acknowledged it existence.

Offline DonBugen

  • Conversationalist
  • **
  • Posts: 200
  • All hours are midnight now.
    • View Profile
Re: Which absent villian will appear in Peace Talks?
« Reply #104 on: September 14, 2017, 01:23:28 AM »
Quote
4) Cat Sith
What? He fell out the window! Into the lake! No one could survive that. He's probably dead.