Yeah, but when it comes to things like that, barometric pressure IS mass. It's the amount of mass whatever column of air of X area would be. And neutralizing gravity doesn't somehow cause it to instantly expand. As we saw when he used it in Changes, it mostly just made them rise up a little bit as their force pushing off of the ground was no longer canceled by gravity. Eliminating gravity doesn't mean that the other air there will suddenly stop holding it in or anything like that. Even if it's in a cone and not a cylinder, the air isn't going to instantly bounce off the air under the effect of gravity, it's still got inertia to deal with. So no superimplodey vacuum, much less an explosion.
Im sorry, but I don't believe that is correct. In a hyperstatic fluid, the force in one direction (aka the pressure) is only a very small part of it; there other factors than just gravity at play (compression, vectors, expansion due to temperature..)
.. and that's the simplified version
as to the inertia question you may be correct but as Knnn pointed out, the forces involved are far larger than most bombs. Your theory would then say bombs can't explode, because of the inertia of the air around them.
this is far enough out of my field I'd rather not tackle the proof, while I had three years of physics in college I'm not an expert, and this is a lot more complex than the Mab or Harry calculations ( for one thing the equation above is only for static, laminar flows. oops.)
even ignoring the air issue, that much of gravity should have drawn in all the mass around it, instead of just squishing down.
oops...
it looked to me like harry just concentrated all the weight of the cars on the vampire, for a fraction of a second. that's several tons of force, more than enough to make vampire pancakes.. and not so much it would wreck half the city.