Author Topic: Sponsor Debt for non-spellcasters?  (Read 9439 times)

Offline Lavecki121

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 1891
    • View Profile
Re: Sponsor Debt for non-spellcasters?
« Reply #45 on: March 04, 2013, 05:39:41 AM »
Quote
There's as much RAW support for non-magical sponsors as there is for the existence of a character named Alphonse Whitwell.

Being sponsored by the police is no less RAW than naming your character Alphonse Whitwell.

I disagree with this statement. RAW explicitly says name your character. It never talks about non magical sponsors

Offline Sanctaphrax

  • White Council
  • Seriously?
  • ****
  • Posts: 12405
    • View Profile
Re: Sponsor Debt for non-spellcasters?
« Reply #46 on: March 04, 2013, 08:13:12 PM »
Eh. The idea I was trying to get across is that (IIRC) the RAW say nothing either way, so it's probably not worth talking about them.

Maybe not the best way to say that, in retrospect.

Offline Lavecki121

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 1891
    • View Profile
Re: Sponsor Debt for non-spellcasters?
« Reply #47 on: March 04, 2013, 10:14:28 PM »
Yea. Ultimatly its up to the group/gm what they want to do.