Author Topic: Question regarding Thaumaturgic Transformation  (Read 2285 times)

Offline Wyrdrune

  • Conversationalist
  • **
  • Posts: 236
    • View Profile
Question regarding Thaumaturgic Transformation
« on: April 07, 2010, 06:19:44 PM »
hello,

I don't know if I understood the section about thaumaturgic transformations right. As we know from Turn Coat, it is possible to change the wizard him or herself into an animal. There it is done quite fast, but I was thinking about a slower transformation, maybe allowing you to keep your clothes on.

I was thinking, if a wizard has such troubles with technology then there will be problems with public transport. What better to transform into some kind of bird and fly over the city to your destination?

I was having following idea - if I understood the rules vor transformations right, I would roll my casting roll against my own Endurance. Do I make the roll against the Endurance value or against an Endurance roll? Is there something like a "willing target" rule?

Let's say my char has an Endurance of 3 and the maximum I can get on an Endurance roll is 7. Then assume we must take another shift to shift the matter of clothes and the small stuff in the pockets to the Nevernever (or wherever mass goes to or comes from with such transformations). This gives an overall result of 8 for the Complexity of the spell.

A wizard with Conviction +5 and Discipline +4 could raise the power in two standard actions - which should mean maybe a few minutes. Only problem is the Lore - maybe invoking an aspect or two or bring in an Specialisation and you should be set. That would mean that for a few minutes of thaumaturgic casting the wizard could be all over the city with no need of mechanical/technological transport.

Spell would look something like this:
Shapechange – Self
Type: Thaumaturgy, transformation
Complexity: equal to own Endurance-roll (+1 shift for clothes and items), usually from 4-8 (4 may fail, 8 is on the safe side)
Effect: applies the temporary aspect like BIRD, or other animal to the subject

Can someone please confirm whether I understood this right or point the errors out? Thanks.