Author Topic: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3  (Read 166189 times)

Offline Thanatos

  • Conversationalist
  • **
  • Posts: 198
    • View Profile
Nevermind.
« Reply #195 on: June 10, 2010, 05:06:12 PM »
Nevermind.

Offline Shecky

  • Bartender
  • O. M. G.
  • ****
  • Posts: 34672
  • Feh.
    • View Profile
Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
« Reply #196 on: June 10, 2010, 05:12:35 PM »
*edited to protect the guilty*
« Last Edit: June 10, 2010, 06:16:53 PM by Shecky »
Official forum rules and precepts; please read: http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,23096.0.html

Quote from: Stanton Infeld
Well, if you couldn't do that with your bulls***, Leonard, I suspect the lad's impervious.

Offline the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh

  • O. M. G.
  • ***
  • Posts: 39098
  • Riding eternal, shiny and Firefox
    • View Profile
Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
« Reply #197 on: June 10, 2010, 05:39:22 PM »
Somewhere, though, JB actually said that Lash really did change, and it's not some con.

He said she really changed, but did not, that I have ever seen, confirm that it was a change to being good, rather than a change from direct temptation tactics to feigning her death.
Mildly OCD. Please do not troll.

"What do you mean, Lawful Silly isn't a valid alignment?"

kittensgame, Sandcastle Builder, Homestuck, Welcome to Night Vale, Civ III, lots of print genre SF, and old-school SATT gaming if I had the time.  Also Pandemic Legacy is the best game ever.

Offline the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh

  • O. M. G.
  • ***
  • Posts: 39098
  • Riding eternal, shiny and Firefox
    • View Profile
Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
« Reply #198 on: June 10, 2010, 05:41:17 PM »
Thanatos would appear to have changed/deleted the post I intended to respond to here, but I just want to say; I did not intend any personal antagonism, and I apologise for coming across as in any way personally antagonistic.
Mildly OCD. Please do not troll.

"What do you mean, Lawful Silly isn't a valid alignment?"

kittensgame, Sandcastle Builder, Homestuck, Welcome to Night Vale, Civ III, lots of print genre SF, and old-school SATT gaming if I had the time.  Also Pandemic Legacy is the best game ever.

Offline Thanatos

  • Conversationalist
  • **
  • Posts: 198
    • View Profile
Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
« Reply #199 on: June 11, 2010, 01:00:25 AM »
Thanatos would appear to have changed/deleted the post I intended to respond to here, but I just want to say; I did not intend any personal antagonism, and I apologize for coming across as in any way personally antagonistic.

I would PM this but your inbox is full...

Sorry man, if I did actually offend you. The original nickname or whatever was supposed to be good-natured (thus the :P that was on it), but the comments following it* did prod my mood the other way for a bit. I don't have anything against you personally either.

Peace :)



*Nothing against you either, Curly and Shecky. Though I may not have appreciated your wisdom at the time, thanks for pointing out that what I said might not be interpreted so lightly.



So, uh... how about those Cubs? :P


Offline neofyte

  • Conversationalist
  • **
  • Posts: 224
    • View Profile
Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
« Reply #200 on: June 11, 2010, 03:01:41 AM »
My ego is like a kid brother.  He follows me around, gets in the way, and sometimes embarrasses the heck out of me.  But I've learned to love the little guy.  After all, he means well.  And he responds better to my love than my loathing.

Offline Murphy's Stunt Double

  • Needs A Life
  • ***
  • Posts: 20870
  • Tiny... but fierce!
    • View Profile
Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
« Reply #201 on: June 11, 2010, 03:29:41 AM »
And Rock and Roll....

which of these is the greatest, Jim?
If you are up to no good, please do no good for me too, okay?   ;D

Offline neofyte

  • Conversationalist
  • **
  • Posts: 224
    • View Profile
Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
« Reply #202 on: June 11, 2010, 03:48:17 AM »
And Rock and Roll....

which of these is the greatest, Jim?

I called and you came!  Another manifest proof of Jung's notion of collective unconscious =)
If I could presume to answer for the man, I believe he would point us to John Lennon, who artfully folded all three into one complete whole  :D
My ego is like a kid brother.  He follows me around, gets in the way, and sometimes embarrasses the heck out of me.  But I've learned to love the little guy.  After all, he means well.  And he responds better to my love than my loathing.

Offline Murphy's Stunt Double

  • Needs A Life
  • ***
  • Posts: 20870
  • Tiny... but fierce!
    • View Profile
Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
« Reply #203 on: June 11, 2010, 02:17:43 PM »
I called and you came!  Another manifest proof of Jung's notion of collective unconscious =)

Jung Rocks! He's my favorite!  :D
If you are up to no good, please do no good for me too, okay?   ;D

Offline the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh

  • O. M. G.
  • ***
  • Posts: 39098
  • Riding eternal, shiny and Firefox
    • View Profile
Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
« Reply #204 on: June 11, 2010, 03:45:39 PM »
And Rock and Roll....

Love has a sword. Rock and Roll, of course, has an axe.
Mildly OCD. Please do not troll.

"What do you mean, Lawful Silly isn't a valid alignment?"

kittensgame, Sandcastle Builder, Homestuck, Welcome to Night Vale, Civ III, lots of print genre SF, and old-school SATT gaming if I had the time.  Also Pandemic Legacy is the best game ever.

Offline IIIMarconeIII

  • Conversationalist
  • **
  • Posts: 586
  • The Answer is ...42
    • View Profile
Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
« Reply #205 on: June 11, 2010, 09:19:05 PM »
^omglol
I sometimes wonder if the manufactures of foolproof items keep a fool on their payroll to test things.

If it doesn't matter who wins or loses, then why do they keep score?
Vince Lombardi

Ever type with no "a" key on a keyboard...it sucks trust me

[URL=http://www.nodiatis.com/personality.h

Offline Shecky

  • Bartender
  • O. M. G.
  • ****
  • Posts: 34672
  • Feh.
    • View Profile
Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
« Reply #206 on: June 11, 2010, 09:27:33 PM »
Love has a sword. Rock and Roll, of course, has an axe.


For Music with Rocks In.
Official forum rules and precepts; please read: http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,23096.0.html

Quote from: Stanton Infeld
Well, if you couldn't do that with your bulls***, Leonard, I suspect the lad's impervious.

Offline neofyte

  • Conversationalist
  • **
  • Posts: 224
    • View Profile
Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
« Reply #207 on: June 12, 2010, 02:47:50 AM »

So who get's the rock axe?  I just can't visualize anyone else but full grown Toot wielding that baby.
Well done Shecky  :D
My ego is like a kid brother.  He follows me around, gets in the way, and sometimes embarrasses the heck out of me.  But I've learned to love the little guy.  After all, he means well.  And he responds better to my love than my loathing.

Offline Dina

  • Has Collapsed Into a Singularity of Posts (a.k.a, "The Dina")
  • ***
  • Posts: 105531
    • View Profile
Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
« Reply #208 on: June 12, 2010, 04:30:03 AM »
Molly!
Missing you, Md 

There are many horrible sights in the multiverse. Somehow, though, to a soul attuned to the subtle rhythms of a library, there are few worse sights than a hole where a book ought to be. Someone has stolen a book (Terry Pratchett)

Offline vultur

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 3942
    • View Profile
Re: Questions Specifically for Jim, Part 3
« Reply #209 on: June 14, 2010, 04:26:10 AM »
In Proven Guilty, the Red King is described as ~4000 years old; in Changes, Luccio says that Arianna predates the human invention of written language (~5300 years ago). Arianna is the Red King's 'descendant'. Was Luccio wrongly informed, or exaggerating, about Arianna's age?