Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - MAW

Pages: [1] 2
1
Cinder Spires Spoilers / Re: traitor's identity?
« on: April 15, 2016, 02:47:52 AM »
I suspected the little snot that was going to be humiliated in the aborted duel when things got interesting; and his entire family.  But that didn't seem to go anywhere....yet!

2
Display Case / Re: Perfect Casting, part 2
« on: October 23, 2010, 07:00:52 AM »
Harry Anderson as Eb.   :o

3
Display Case / Re: Perfect Casting, part 2
« on: October 23, 2010, 02:33:09 AM »
According to section XXVII subsection 12, article j of the Hollywood bylaws you are not allowed to have a genre project without including Mark Shepard somewhere in the cast.

4
Display Case / Re: Perfect Casting, part 2
« on: October 22, 2010, 12:31:54 AM »
Hey, he could always play the field marshal of the 'za knights.

5
Display Case / Re: Perfect Casting, part 2
« on: October 12, 2010, 06:06:52 AM »
Quote from: tiny[but]fierce on October 12, 2010, 03:01:07 AM
So tell me again that soulless Spike can't feel. :)
Not what I said, original premise of the show was that vampires, having no soul's, can't feel love.  Anything they did with Spike after that, before he was ensouled, was pure fan-wanking.

6
Display Case / Re: Perfect Casting, part 2
« on: October 11, 2010, 12:21:42 AM »
Quote from: hatshep2 on October 10, 2010, 06:02:18 PM

But, but, but...how?  ;) Just curious - did you like both shows? Did you ship Buffy/Angel? or Buffy/Spike? Just curious where it was a case of "love River" or "hate Spike" or something in the middle.  :)
Liked both shows, but the fact that Spike was considered 'relationship material' while he was still a soulless monster is way too creepy for me.  I was always of the faction that stuck with Wheedon's original point, no soul = no capacity for love, only creepy obsession.   :P

7
Display Case / Re: Perfect Casting, part 2
« on: October 10, 2010, 06:45:22 AM »
Quote from: hatshep2 on October 10, 2010, 03:56:10 AM
River beat Spike?????? What? No way! I've never cared much for River and I ADORE Spike. I'm so bitter...give me something to punch and I might be alright in a month.  :-[
Sorry, but I am more than content with these results.   8)

8
Display Case / Re: Perfect Casting, part 2
« on: September 25, 2010, 06:24:14 AM »
Well, it's Chicago after all.  Lots and lots of republican congressmen looking for discrete 'company'.

9
Display Case / Re: Perfect Casting, part 2
« on: September 25, 2010, 02:20:28 AM »
Quote from: hatshep2 on September 24, 2010, 07:23:23 PM
Lol! Henchman Thomas and call-girl Murphy...not sure who would be the more offended.  :D

No, no, no.  You have it wrong.
It's Rent-boy Thomas and call-girl Murphy...still not sure who would be more offended.   8)

10
Display Case / Re: Perfect Casting, part 2
« on: September 10, 2010, 01:35:23 AM »
Time to upset the apple cart again.

Crispin Glover for Nicodemus. 

11
Display Case / Re: Perfect Casting, part 2
« on: September 09, 2010, 06:44:58 AM »
Michael needs to be someone big, hard, and who looks like a dad.  I think that last lets Sorbo out (not to mention age).  How about Colin Ferguson from Eureka?

12
Display Case / Re: Perfect Casting, part 2
« on: September 02, 2010, 08:24:46 AM »
Based on Talent, Size, and general appearence, I have 2 nominees to back.
For Thomas - Matt Keeslar.  He's played the good-guy (Middleman!), and the evil bastard (Dollhouse) excellantly and looks about right to me.
For Murphy - Kristen Chenowyth.  About the right size coloring and shape, and unmistakable acting chops.

13
Display Case / Re: Perfect Casting, part 2
« on: August 30, 2010, 08:01:54 AM »
I love the way these things tend to change as time passes, and how some people refuse to believe their favorite actors have aged beyond eligibility for some roles. 
That said, I'm placing an advance vote for Zachery Levi to play Harry in about 5-10 years.   ;D

14
Display Case / Re: Perfect Casting, part 2
« on: June 05, 2010, 08:24:56 AM »
The biggest problem I have casting the under 40's is that you have to constantly change around as your mind's favorites are ground down by papa time.
With that in mind I was looking at some younger folk for the roles here, and saw what I thought was a good fit for Murphy, not quite old enough now, but fine by the time any likely shooting would start:
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1689872/  Alisoon Haislip.
Thoughts?

15
Display Case / Re: Perfect Casting, part 2
« on: January 01, 2010, 11:09:30 AM »
It's been said several times already, so I'll just throw my vote into the pile and say that I believe that Butters should be played by Zack Gallaphinacas.  The more he ages, the more he becomes Butters to me.

Pages: [1] 2