Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - g33k

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 180
1
DF Spoilers / Re: Will he marry her?
« on: Yesterday at 07:55:50 PM »
... Second Q:  Will they consummate?  I think yes, too.

I don't think they can.
Some time ago, WoJ stated that the WK-Mantle combined with Whamp-Mojo in really bad ways: the only possible outcomes would be a mentally-broken & fully whamp-enslaved WK, or a dead Whampire.

2
Also, in a recent video, his wife needs him to finish it before the new year I believe,  over a comment or discussion with a redditor? 

Welp, he looks unlikely to hit "by the new year!"   ;)
It has been stuck at 28% complete for over a month.   :o

Maybe we can generously presume the timeframe was "a year" (i.e. from whenever the reddit exchange occurred) rather than a hard-dated "by new years."

3
DF Spoilers / Re: Will he marry her?
« on: Yesterday at 07:40:23 PM »
Harry will go to the bathroom right before heading to the altar and ... transfer to Mirror Mirror land, leaving Lara at the altar and Mab seething. 
This is my theory, more or less.

Maybe not a bathroom, maybe just the changing-area where Harry takes off his jeans/T/duster uniform & puts on a tux (but it still has the necessary mirror for checking fit&c...)

I don't know, I can see it go either way, the thing is I don't think Lara wants to get married anymore than Harry, between the two of them, they may be able to outsmart Mab.
Agreed:  neither of them really want to marry.  The thing is, I don't think Mab wants that, either!  I think she has a big ol' pile of other agendas based on her telling them to get married... including forcing them to work together to (try to) outsmart her.  Mab being Mab, I'm sure she has contingency plans for if they do get married, but I think her preferred option is for them not to.

The main questions I have are:  is it a full swap, with Mirror!Harry coming to Harry!Prime's world (where he's expected to go through with the marriage to Lara)?  Because that's part of the OG Mirror,Mirror ST:TOS episode, with evil!Kirk&co coming to the Federation, and Jim has been frank that he's stealing shamelessly there.  And then (also based on the ST episode):  is it just the Harrys who swap, or is it Harry plus a big pack of his Scooby Gang (and if so, who?) swapping with Mirror!Harry and his Posse?

I can just imagine the moment when Harry is standing there at the altar -- seeing Mab(??!?) in the front row of the audience -- and waiting to see who his bride is... aaaand it's Lara Raith, making Mirror!Harry go "o shit, I thought I was going to a safer universe!"

Meanwhile, Mab is thinking, "what the fuck have you done, Dresden, where is Winter's Knightmantle??!?"  And when the officiant gets to "Speak now, or forever hold your peace," it's Mab who speaks up.

4
DF Spoilers / Re: Mouse Can Talk, Can Harry Hear?
« on: Yesterday at 07:11:16 PM »
In Changes, and subsequent stories, we learn Mouse is capable of communicating at a human intellect level. In the subsequent stories, we see that some humans can understand Mouse or other human level intellect canines (for example, Molly and the Alphas in Bombshells). When Harry is in dog form in Changes, Harry can understand Mouse:

Also in the first chapter of Changes, Harry seems to understand Mouse at that same intellectual level:

Harry could have been just guessing at what Mouse meant by interpreting his body language and stuff. I personally think Harry was dissociating enough that he was in a state where he could "hear" Mouse like Molly does.

Do you think Harry capable of understanding Mouse? I doubt he will ever understand Mouse in the books because, as Jim said, Mouse knows too much. My question is whether he could if he worked on it.

Harry has always talked aloud, to himself, as one of Jim's exposition techniques.

Dog-owners -- by and large -- talk to their dogs, in ways far beyond what dogs can comprehend; Jim used that as an expansion of Harry's own talk-aloud habit.

But it has been an ongoing theme of the stories that Harry has realized more and more that Mouse is far more intelligent than the average dog.  There's a scene in Turn Coat where Mouse gets shot (bullet didn't penetrate far) protecting Molly, and Harry uses it as a "teaching moment" to get Molly more aware of the potential consequences for her actions... and shortly thereafter, Harry realizes that Mouse was deliberately feigning a worse injury & more pain, playing to Harry's own lessons in perfect comprehension of what Harry was teaching, and how Harry was going about the lesson.

5
DF Spoilers / Re: Can we see Rudy take up a sword
« on: December 17, 2025, 06:16:02 PM »
What is scary is a lot of people, won't question it. 
Absolutely.
Doesn't much matter, for stuff like pop fiction.

But RL issues are getting buried under extremely-realistic AI slop, too; and people are giving it credence...

6
DF Spoilers / Re: Can we see Rudy take up a sword
« on: December 16, 2025, 06:10:46 PM »
... the A.I. gave me this:
------------
<SNIP>
-----------------
This wasn't in the copy of Battleground that I read ...

Classic AI hallucination:  include a light dusting of genuine references, but placed in incorrect contexts for a surreal result.

7
DF Spoilers / Re: List your top 5 Dresden files books
« on: December 14, 2025, 06:48:26 PM »
This list varies depending on my mood sometimes ...

Same.
Except for me, most of the time not just "some."

My top-most favorite book is whichever came out most recently, which lasts for about 6ish months.

Most of the rest of the time, it's whichever I'm currently re-reading (which most-often is whichever my wife is currently listening-to in audiobook format (I often listen with her)).

Occasionally, it's a small&scattered collection of books, when I'm cross-referencing clues to assemble/verify/test a WAG.

 

8
DF Spoilers / Re: Can we see Rudy take up a sword
« on: December 14, 2025, 06:31:36 PM »
... It was a warning, Harry took it as a warning, Harry was ashamed and didn't forget.  In other words a strong warning, and then Harry went on to try and redeem himself.  That's the point ...
No; the point is that Angels don't do that.

They do not "step in" that way, not even to "warn:"  not with an unambiguous Angelic-caliber "thou shalt not," not to influence mortals' free will.

That the Sword did burn Harry can only be a "warning" that a Spookyside "bad actor" is acting upon Harry; that his free will isn't entirely his own.  A free-willed mortal choice does not get an Angelic response or intervention.

... Or very realistic, between his adrenalin and the Winter Knight's mantle Harry wasn't going to come to his senses that easily or quickly after seeing his beloved murdered and bleeding out in his arms.

Hypothetically, the WK-mantle influence may indeed be sufficient to get a KotC/Angelic intervention.

...

Maybe...

But ...

1/ But also, nope -- Harry already made that choice, and now has to live with the consequences.  When he chose to take on the WK-mantle, Harry chose chose to eventually become a monster.  The Angels (once again) do not intervene/warn when mortals have made their choice.  You might argue that some mortal may have been "tricked" into taking up a Knight-mantle without understanding how it could mess with their head; but Harry knew it would happen, fully accepted that it would (as it turns out, he has a slim chance not to become a monster!).

2/ But also, why both(all) of the Knights?  We really don't see more than one KotC stepping into a fight for "just any" supernatural threat; and as "threats" go, a faerie Knight isn't exactly top-tier!  The most-obvious answer to "why are all the KotC's in that fight?" is "because they are fighting the KotC-archfoe, the Denarians."

= = =

I want to reiterate, here, that my "Denarian Hypothesis" here is actually my #2 choice, not my #1.

I think "it was just the WK-Mantle (with no Denarians) that triggered/enabled the Sword to act" is a better argument.  .. but also, I think there is a decent argument -- with supporting Dresdenverse lore -- to make a solid case for a Denarian Shadow to be involved.

9
DF Spoilers / Re: Can we see Rudy take up a sword
« on: December 13, 2025, 07:12:34 PM »
... It wasn't angels that stopped Harry in that moment, it was his very human friends who stopped him, true they were better equipped, but in the end it was his very human friends risking injury to stop their very upset, but powerful and dangerous friend from doing something he'd regret later, and in the end harm their cause ...

Yes, his friends were there, and worked to stop him... risked themselves to stop him!

But the angelic power of Fidelacchius came to bear against Harry... and that doesn't happen for mortals making purely-mortal choices.  The fact that Fidelacchius' miraculous powers manifested:  this says that the supernatural is misbehaving in that scene; that mortal free-will is compromised (and/or that mortals are facing supernatural might, that mortal flesh and bone alone cannot match)

And the fact that both (aka "all" at this point) the knights took to the field... that's more ambiguous, but a good reason to at least suspect the culprit is Denarians; that I can recall, the only other multi-Knight action we've seen was later against Ethniu herself (who solo'ed against Mab+Odin+WhiteCouncil)... and previously, against Denarians.  I repeat that the WK mantle is "enough" supernatural influence to justify a KotC involvement; I think it more-likely.  We don't have to demand Denarian presence... but.  There is that niggle...

It just gives me pause:  nothing called for Jim to write it that way.  Harry could have looked down at a fallen and bleeding Sanya, and come to his senses... without bringing in Butters, or Fidelacchius.  He could have had Butters show up, and not use Fidelacchius.  It would have been a much more "human" moment; but Jim specifically invoked the Angelic.

10
DF Spoilers / Re: Can we see Rudy take up a sword
« on: December 12, 2025, 03:06:12 AM »
  Yeah, I read that way more in the save Harry from himself sense - "against" is not really applicable.  The faithsaber burned him to *warn* him, after all.

Yes... exactly!  The faithsaber's angelic powers activated.

Again and again, we see Uriel explaining that purely-mortal actions and purely-mortal choices do not give the Angels any scope to act.

Nicodemus' cadre of "Squires" shot up Michael's house, broke in, grabbed Charity, put Uriel's mortal form at risk (with no Grace to save him!), while a bunch of literal guardian Angels stood by and did ... nothing.  Because the Squires were all mortals, acting with enough "Free Will" to be beyond Angelic intervention.

If it were just "Harry being Harry" -- mortal, fallible, flawed -- the Angel wouldn't have given Harry the slightest bit of discomfort.  The Angels don't stop mortals from mortally screwing-up.  The pain was a clear demonstration that, justified as his rage may have been, it wasn't just Harry being Harry; Harry was being influenced.

... I'm not sure I buy the part about intense anger indicating Harry still has a shadow attached to him after all, either.  He got a lot colder than when Lash was torqueing his temper, real quickly.  Seems more Winter mantle behaviour...
TBH, I agree with you.  Harry's symptoms were more "Wintery" than "Hellish," and we know the Knights might have a particular interest in opposing the Denarians... but they'll stand against pretty much any/every supernatural threat.

An enraged Winterknight certainly qualifies (and justifies the Angelic action)!

I  consider the "Lasciel's Shadow" theory a 2nd-choice to the "Winter Mantle" one, but also:  why not both?  I'm quite certain Lasciel knows how Faerie and Winter and Knightmantles work, and her Shadow likely knows how to work with "cold wintery rage."  Deception isn't "second nature" to the Fallen, it's their first nature!

And, I repeat a critical point:  not one but two KotC's, 100% of the Swords in-play, were came to stop Harry; who was, in the end, merely a Knight of Faerie.  Any one KotC could likely have stopped the Winterknight.  Both of them taking the field?  That hints more-than-gently at Denarian influence.

So (despite it being my "second choice" here) I find the Shadow not at all a distant second!

... My read on the scene was something powerful and knowledgeable, probably one or both of the Fallen, manipulated Rudy's mind ...
I don't think malign influence upon Rudy allows Angels to act to stop Harry.  I point again to the Squires invading Michael's home:  those Squires certainly were under Nicodemus & Anduriel's influence; but the Angels still permitted the attack on Michael's home, and for Charity to be abducted.

But honestly, my take on Rudy was that he was indeed "just being Rudy:" cowardly, panicked, deep in denial about the existence of magic, stressed to the edge of sanity because he's experiencing magic with his own senses and still refuses to believe.  And really crappy trigger discipline.

We've seen all of this before from Rudy.  And yes, this is perhaps the worst we've ever seen it... but then, the situation is the worst he has ever seen:  an actual supernatural army is invading Chicago!

I don't think it takes the whispers of a Shadow (or other supernatural influence) to explain any of shitty things Rudy does.

11
DF Spoilers / Re: Can we see Rudy take up a sword
« on: December 11, 2025, 12:08:29 AM »
... would have, if not for the intervention of two KotC (hmmm...) 
^^^ Yeah, this ^^^

Two KotC's -- the only two Swords with wielders! -- are there in one scene, one fight...
taking the field against Harry Dresden.

The Knights whose main purpose is to oppose Denarian corruption, specifically.

Tell me again how we can be so certain that Lasciel's Shadow is gone from Harry...?

Not "Lash," but Lasciel's Shadow...
 
... nearly corrupted Harry into committing a wrathful cold-blooded murder ...
<flips back through books>
<looks for last time Harry was having, not just "anger," but out-of-control anger issues>

Huh... when the Shadow was influencing Harry without his realizing it, that's when.

= = =

My theory here is that the "imprint" of Lasciel takes some time to spawn a "Shadow" to interact with the mortal Host.

But that the imprint of the Fallen Angel is still there, having watched Harry actually redeem the Shadow into "Lash."  And it's still working on it's original mission; because it never actually interacted with Harry... never got changed by him.  So it's beginning to stir, again... this rage might be the sign of a newly-forming Shadow.
 

12
DF Spoilers / Re: Does anyone think Harry isn’t the original Merlin?
« on: December 10, 2025, 11:59:15 PM »
... We already have hints that Harry is one of the legendary Starborn ...
I'm pretty sure we have more than "hints" of this!
I think it's an established part of the canon.
 

13
DF Spoilers / Re: If you can have just one question answered....
« on: December 10, 2025, 11:41:12 PM »
I know a lot of people have wondered about who cowl is. Some people wondered who was driving the car that hit Harry. Others have wondered many other things. If you can have one question answered in 12 months what would it be? ...
I think my biggest curiosity has to be around the whole "Starborn" thing.

I don't really think 12M is the place where we'll learn that, however.  We know LtW and RS are both potential "tutors" / info-sources, but I think that's too much an outside-Chicago story-arc, when the book is heavily about Harry leaning-into becoming "the Wizard of Chicago" more fully.

I think (I've shared this theory here before) that a huge part of Mab's motivation, in ordering the marriage, is to aim her Starborn Winternight at the  Nemvector  lurking within the White Court.  Papa Raith is known to have amassed a substantive library on the Outsider/Starborn apocalypse-cycle, and I think Harry will get at least some peeks into that (a secondary element in Mab's planning:   she knows of the library, wants her Winterknight better-equipped as an anti-Outsider weapon, and "knowledge is power.") ... I am hoping/expecting we'll learn at least some snippets from an arc on this topic.

I suspect Bonea has a goodly bit of Starborn info... but I think Jim will dribble out the Starborn info slowly (into and throughout the BAT) so we won't get to the "Angelic-level" secrets known to Bonea this soon.  So, Bonnie will still be in "figuring things out" mode, and likely unable to give Harry useful info there.
 

14
DF Spoilers / Re: If you can have just one question answered....
« on: December 10, 2025, 11:25:22 PM »
  If murdered, who murdered Malcolm Dresden?  I know about ten more questions follow that.

My bet is that it was Lea (or maybe Mab) -- he died with a peaceful smile, so it was someone who brought images of Margaret with them.  Mab passed (at least for a while) as human (Ms. Sommerset) to the very-clued-in and very-suspicious Harry Dresden; so we know she can sustain such deceptions for a while.

15
DF Spoilers / Re: Harry Dresden's New Apprentice!!?!
« on: December 10, 2025, 11:20:57 PM »
... If the apprentice was straight human it would be a pissing match with the WC because Harry isn't part of the wc anymore. And you know that the merlin would make it a "public" complaint to Mab ...
It's not like Harry's gonna "register" his new apprentice!  The WC has already proven itself unable to track down newly emerging potential apprentices; how closely can they afford to watch Harry?

But then... Harry's still a mortal, and a wizard.  Mab will ask, "Are you claiming, as the White Council of Wizards and signatories of the Unseelie Accords, that you have authority over my Winter Knight?"

Because ultimately, that's the claim the WC would be making:  that they're in charge of what Harry does/doesn't do (that Harry doesn't get to have/train an apprentice).

That claim isn't likely to carry much weight when Mab shows up wearing black.

... Maybe (thought I don't think it is) Thomas's sister has talent and can't sit on the sidelines even though she didn't turn. That's the kind of thing Jim likes to do to Harry. It would give Harry something to feel guilty about how Thomas will react if he ever gets him back
Ooooh, Inari!  That's another interesting option!
I like it, indeed.

I still think Fitz fits better.  We know he has some level of magic.  I like Harry looping back to him, to give him a bit of testing & training... but eventually passing him off to Morty as the better teacher for Fitz's talents (and this giving him the idea of leveraging the Paranet (and the array of minor talents & sheer number of clued-in observers therein) in an organized fashion to find/train new & emergent talents & prevent them from turning warlock).
 

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 180