Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - 123456789blaaa

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 13
1
My interpretation:  Toot is getting bigger because he is taking on responsibility (some WoJ's use the term influence, others say "taking action").  Part of this responsibility does mean that he is taking authority over some other dew-drop fairies, but he is also taking on responsibility in more ways than just leading the Guard.  For example, he has started associating this role as having certain duties to Harry, and now to Winter as well. 

The responsibility thing is key in my aforementioned “Mantle Theory” thoughts as well.

On the other hand, I am quite confused about one detail (I mentioned being confused about some details in the OP). 

On the one hand, we have multiple references to the Sidhe and Faeries coming from mortal origins.  Jim has said “All the fae are part mortal.  There is some bit of mortal in every single one of the fae.”  Mother Summer discussed with Harry about how “we conceive our children with mortals.”  Mab says she was mortal once, and Jim has talked about her having been a mortal.

On the other hand, it is hard to imagine dew-drop fairies procreating with mortals.  Especially the extremely tiny one that guided Harry to Maeve in Summer Knight.  And Jim has commented over and over that Mab and all the Sidhe come from origins like Toot’s.  Confusing.

Well Toot-Toot was able to pack away that whole pizza... :o.

2
Torture for information and other mandane ways of doing evil i.e: violating free wil carries its own taint. In PG, Murphy admits feeling tainted when she shots agent benton.

The point is, when you add magic to the equation, the taint becomes much, much worst.

It makes sense. In PG, it is stated that the reason god gave human the 3 swords is to balanced the enormous advantages the supranatural have over the vanilla human. Providing an extra penalty for wizards that violate free wil does make sense for the balance.

Wizards are humans, they have free wil. If they choose to use their free wil to kill and enslaved, it is their choice, so long as they pay the penalty.

If a predanatural creature violates free wil i.e" eating people, they cannot pay the penalty by losing their humanity/sanity. They are not human in the first place. These creatures are penaltied by different means. The little folk are weak and cannot do much harm, but they are virtually imppossible to find without magic. Lesser fei i.e: Bridge trolls, are teritorial and can easily be avoided or chase away, even by vanilla methods. If humanity choose to stay in denial and refuse to believe in the supranatural and therefore caught off guard, it is the human's own fault.

Other predators like the rampires and the blampires are the real evils. For these creatures penalty comes in the form of weakness to sunlight, weakness against faith based magic and inability to cross threshold. And if they got too active, they'll have either the KotC or some wizards hunting and killing them.

Demons/creatures from the nevernever cannot cross without being summoned.  And those creatures who is powerful enough to cross without invitation i.e" Mab, have an equal power balancing them i.e: Titania.

All in all, Butcher have created a quite balanced and realistic supranatural world.

Murphy saying she felt "tainted" is just the natural reaction to doing something she considers wrong for the first time. No evidence of the supernatural "turn you insane" type of corruption. 
 
Can I get that PG quote? I always thought the swords were given to balance out the Denarian coins. One sword for 10 coins each.

Also, magic has a far greater requirement for investment to work.  The wizard has to believe the thing is right, and will work, or it won't.  You can't half-ass it.

However, you can entirely half-ass taking someone's eyeballs out with a melon baller.  You can do that even if you're 49% opposed, as long as you're 51% for it.  No sense of justification required in order to be able to do that horrible thing.

I meant using magic to take someone's eyes out for the explicit purpose of torturing them. You'd have to believe the torture was right.

3
I can't remember this WoJ (not surprising, you've been around a LOT longer than I have :) ) but this is a great paradigm for why snuffing a life by dropping a building on someone with magic is more significant than doing it with a gun.

I recall Harry saying it in the books as well.

The problem is that this doesn't explain why doing other horrible things doesn't corrupt you as well. You're going to have a hard time convincing me that  (for example) slowly ripping someone's eyes out to get information has less of an impact on the wizards mind then blowing their head off with a fireball.

You can also kill lots of beings without souls/Free Will and you won't get corrupted either (at least not in the black magic sense). Given how similar and friendly Little Folk are to humans, it seems strange to me that killing them doesn't warp your mind just as much as killing a human. Maybe you could make a argument for a Red Court vamp or ghoul or whatever but the Little Folk? Or an angel?  ???

I'm not saying it's completely wrong but I think there's something else causing the corruption as well. I'm partial to the RPG theory that the first few Laws are based around Free Will and the last few are just "wrong" in the sense of "Things That Man Was Not Meant To Do".

4
JB/Harry has said that the magic must obey the laws of physics. Belief is important to make magic work, but even when it does it can't change the fundamental laws of nature. At least on Harry's level of ability.

By WoJ there are no upper limits to what magic can accomplish. With enough power you can literally do anything.

So it seems the more power you have, the less you have to obey the current laws of reality.

5
There's a bunch of stuff but I'm far too lazy to go into all of it. DV magic is a murky as heck topic.


6
I think part of the point of DB is that Harry's rules-lawyering about Sue succeeds because of the point of the law against necromancy actually being "do not commit crimes against dead people" rather than "this force is inherently Evil", there is the bit (I think it's chapter 19 of DB, I posted the quote a few weeks back but am not finding it now) where he realised that Kumori using necromancy to save the life of the gangster who got shot was a good act and that he had previously been wrong about necromancy being an inherently evil force.

This?:

Quote from: Dead Beat, Chapter 19
I sat in the backseat with my eyes closed and thought about what I'd learned. Kumori had saved the gunshot victim's life. If everything Lamar had said was accurate, it meant that she had gone out of her way to do it. And whatever she'd done, it had been an extremely difficult working to leave a mystic impression as intense as it did. That might explain why Kumori had done very little during the altercation with Cowl. I had expected her to be nearly as strong as her partner, but when she tried to take the book from me, her power hadn't been stronger than my own muscles and limbs.

But the Kemmler Alumni Association was in town with some vicious competition in mind. Why would Kumori have expended her strength for a stranger, rather than saving it for battling rival necromancers? Could the shooting victim have been important to her plans in some way?

It didn't track. The victim was just one more thug for the outfit, and he certainly wasn't going to be doing anything useful from his bed in intensive care.

I had to consider the possibility that she'd been trying to do the right thing: using her power to help someone in dire need.

The thought made me uncomfortable as hell. I knew that the necromancers I'd met were deadly dangerous, and that if I wanted to survive a conflict with them, I would have to be ready to hit them fast and hard and without any doubts. That's easy when the enemy is a frothing, psychotic monster. But Kumori's apparently humanitarian act changed things. It made her a person, and people are a hell of a lot harder for me to think about killing.

Even worse, if she'd been acting altruistically, it would mean that the dark energy the necromancers seemed to favor might not be something wholly, inherently evil. It had been used to preserve life, just as the magic I knew could be used either to protect or to destroy.

I'd always considered the line between black magic and white to be sharp and clear. But if that dark power could be employed in whatever fashion its wielder chose, that made it no different from my own. Dammit. Investigation was supposed to make me certain of what needed to be done. It was not supposed to confuse me even more.

When I opened my eyes, thick clouds had covered the sun and painted the whole world in shades of grey.

So it's more like he finds that things may be greyer than he thought rather than "Necromancy=not inherently evil".

On the other hand, later on we also get this quote:

Quote from: Dead Beat, Chapter 29
Maybe that wasn't the point. Maybe this was one of those things in which the effort meant more than the outcome. I mean, if there was a chance, even a tiny, teeny chance that Kumori was right, and that the world could be so radically changed, wouldn't I be obliged to try? Even if I never reached the goal, never finished the quest, wouldn't the attempt to vanquish death itself be a worthy pursuit?

Wow.

This question was a big one. Way bigger than me.

I shook my head and told Kumori, "I don't know about that. What I know is that I've seen the fruits of that kind of path. I saw Cowl try to murder me when I got in his way. I've seen what Grevane and the Corpsetaker have done. I've heard about the suffering and misery Kemmler caused—and is still causing today, thanks to his stupid book.

"I don't know about something as big as trying to murder death. But I know that you can tell a tree from what kind of fruit falls off it. And the necromancy tree doesn't drop anything that isn't rotten." "Ours is a calling," Kumori said, her voice flat. "A noble road."

"I might be willing to believe you if so much of that road wasn't paved in the corpses of innocents." I saw her head shake slowly beneath the hood. "You sound like them. The Council. You do not understand."

"Or maybe I'm just not quite arrogant enough to start rearranging the universe on the assumption that I know better than God how long life should last. And there's a downside to what you're saying, too. How about trying to topple the regime of an immortal Napoleon, or Attila, or Chairman Mao? You could as easily preserve the monsters as the intellectual all-stars. It can be horribly abused, and that makes it dangerous."

I faced her down for a long and silent second. Then she let out a sigh and said, "I think we have exhausted the possibilities of this conversation."

Now I know you probably think Harry is mistaken and close-minded here but I'd say that Necromancy=evil is what Jim is going for. There is the Mother Winter-Kumori-Death connection for one thing.

7
And yet I look outside my window and it seems grey to me right now.

I think you know what I meant neuro. I was using a simplified example. Use any fact of your choosing in place of it if you wish.

Unless you want to argue that there are no facts. That's a line of debate that I hold no interest in continuing.

Why not ? It could be exploring a what-if about socialism along with a what-if about dragons.

It could... but it probably isn't. People who attempt to challenge themselves in this way are not the norm. Book writing is hard and then you have to do that on top of it? It's like playing pro-baseball and then hamstringing yourself to see what it's like. There are probably some people who do so but most pro-baseball players won't. 

I think you underestimate the degree to which a lot of speculative genre writers are following through consequences of where a given idea leads, even when it leads in directions very different from their own beliefs.

Perhaps. See above.

8
I think it is more complicated than that, since we are all unique in our emotional make up, it doesn't really matter if there are "things correct or incorrect" in the eyes of morality or society in that song. What matters is how a person hears and translates those words in his or her brain.  One person can be indifferent, another, hate the song, another love the song but neither is moved by it in an overtly emotional way..  Then there is the extremes, as the odd person who listens and is inspired to become a saint, and the other person who hears the same song and is inspired to become a serial killer.

I'm not talking about morality or society or emotions. I'm talking about statements like "the sky is blue". Pure fact.

<snip>
Myself, I try not to assume the author has an agenda of that sort; exploration of questions is more fun than proselytising answers.



I think you misinterpreted the quote. An author doesn't have to have an agenda to put their own worldview into the text.

For example, if a person writes a book about dragons where there is a detailed functioning socialist society, the author is probably not someone who believes all socialism is doomed to fail. This doesn't mean she put the society in their to show how socialist societies totally can work. Perhaps it was just neccecary for the plot to function or an interesting bit of worldbuilding flavor.

There are of course exceptions but I'm pretty comfortable in saying that they're the minority. It's not something you just tack on to another novel. You need to have it in mind from the start.

9
I don't think the WG is the creator (at least, not how most people think of it) or the final authority. Jim however is both of those things and I think he's pretty much spelled out his views (see: the WoJ's I posted in the link). The WG and his forces may not know everything on the subject but they're pretty dang close.

I think you're off a bit with your last paragraph. IMO a better example would be if someone listened to this song and thought it was completely serious and not intended to be comedic. The person may not find the music funny at all-her emotions may be different than mine- but that doesn't change what the songwriters intended. If she says that the AoA literally singing "meaningless whisper" was not intended to be funny, I'd be comfortable in calling her wrong. 

People may have different feelings and emotional reactions to different works. I would never attempt to force them to feel differently. However, that doesn't mean their aren't correct things and incorrect things to believe about that work.

10
Unfortunately, the analogy/parallel I am going to build will be based off of RL which doesn't have magic, and thus this non magical parallel could muddy some of the waters because part of this discussion is magical corruption from killing and doing nasty things, vs just plain corruption for the same thing without magic.  But the goal of this parallel is to conceptualize corruption WRT non mortals.

The Nazis went through a long, systematic campaign to dehumanize in the minds of the populace people like Jews and Gypsies and other victims of their "Final Solution.”  They even used the term “Untermensch” (German for underman, sub-man, sub-human) to describe these people.  From my life view it is incredibly difficult to understand what was portrayed in the last episode of “Band of Brothers” where the baker was completely indifferent to the fate of the “Untermensch” in the concentration camp down the road. 

Tying it to how killing non mortals can corrupt Harry, in reply #26 of this very topic I quoted the relevant portions of WN where, at the beginning of the Camp Kaboom scene, Harry said there was no use hating the Ghouls for who they were.  At that point he displays that he still posses empathy for this class of sentient beings.  Now however, Harry appears to see them as the equivalent of “Untermensch” not worthy of compassion while they are being exterminated in mass. 

Harry’s ability to remain empathetic towards humanity remains largely intact (the goal of the Council’s laws) but it seems to have been destroyed for those that fall into the class, “non human” which could certainly fall under the concept of having been corrupted by his killing non-humans with his magic.  (A consequence of the "universal guidelines" of how magic works)

I go with SAZ's response:

Thanks Serack.

Does anyone think any of the rage and hate Harry is feeling in the above WK quote was just his own natural over developed “defend and avenge the children credo” happily enhanced by Lashiel’s shadow?

Knowing that I am bucking the trend, I am still unconvinced that killing non humans with magic results in a mystical black magic mind warping stain. As argued by others above, it seems that the normal psychological stress and strains of killing anything in a violent way is more than damaging in a normal real world way. Everyone is different and deals with violence and gruesome stuff differently, but the stuff Harry has seen in the books is more than enough to make him at least a candidate for any number of PTSD like issues… (Or at least I think so in my non professional mental health way of thinking).

So are Harry’s actions at his B-party a result of black magic warping? Sure in part, but let us not forget what he has gone though in life. It is not surprising Harry is getting darker and more violent. I suspect and hope that toward the end of the DF or the BAT Harry will begin to heal or find some balance.

Harry was angry because the ghouls ripped apart sixteen year olds. Even with the quote from Backup, I think Harry would have done the same thing if humans had did that (though he may have not used magic to kill specifically).

Musings on the morality of how to treat non-mortals (non-Free Willed beings) are blurry. Personally I think Jim himself is struggling a bit with his decision to make some creatures "always evil" and our modern time views. I'd elaborate but conveniently, I started a discussion on the subject in a thread that I started in another forum (note: on the Maeve thing at the bottom, I was later convinced that Nemesis did not give her Free Will. It only altered her nature. She was just tricked).

11
My paradigm for how magic works based off of many WoJ's and canon.  This paradigm is that using magic is essentially using your will to rewrite reality as you see fit (this post outlines a lot of this paradigm but in a different context).  Harry spends a lot of time pontificating about magic requiring that you believe in what you are doing.  He also discusses how changing something causes a reciprocal change upon yourself (White Night discussion with “Lash”) so if you are using your will/magic to rewrite reality to snuff the life/free will out of mortals (or even non-mortals), reality is going to push back and reshape your own being in consistent way.
<snip>

The thing is though, there is an obvious difference in the books between corruption caused by breaking the Laws against non-mortals (though I'd expand that to non-Free Willed beings) and mortals. How many vampires and Fae and demons has Harry killed with magic? Sure he's gotten darker over the series but it's still nowhere near the level of corruption wizards get from killing only a few mortals. I think you could make a very strong argument that there is no (metaphysical) corruption from breaking the Laws against non-mortals.

No one gives a crap (in terms of morality) in-universe about the extinction of the RC after all. I don't think Jim does.

12
DF Reference Collection / Re: Suggest Topics Here!
« on: October 25, 2013, 05:58:16 PM »
in addition to the topic The Count just pointed out, I'll need to xfer this other topic of his soon

Also his topic Tehom/The primordial darkness before the light=Outsiders

I also want to keep tabs on this reference heavy theoryish topic I generated this week about Magic sticking to Outsiders

Come on guys, if you know of great references that should be archived let us know :)

Just a reminder in case you've forgotten. Take your time if you're just busy.

13
DF Reference Collection / Re: Suggest Topics Here!
« on: October 01, 2013, 09:50:16 PM »
Can I get a 2nd for this topic?
http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,35012.0.html

(a lot of it might be echoed by or be an echo of other theory topics already archived, but this one seems to have been written rather soon after the CD release, and is rather extensive)

Ideally I'd prefer to make another thread on the subject that also incorporates the many great theories other people have come up with as well. Given how time-consuming and boring it is to search through thread after thread however, that's probably not going to happen...

So yeah, seconding.

15
I believe there was also a WoJ about the "Demonreach disintegration wall destroying Harry's amulet" problem in CD. I'll try and find it.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 13