1
DFRPG / Should I allow a player to use these stunts?
« on: May 17, 2013, 04:00:22 AM »
Running a game and a player has two stunts that I question. Wanted to get some other opinions.
First stunt:
Use endurance to defend against physical attacks.
Second stunt:
Use presence instead of conviction for determining mental stress boxes.
My issues:
With the first, how do you justify that? That you just eat the damage to be awesome? That's reflected in stress boxes, not defending against it. I can't see the justification on it.
With the second, again there's the issue of justification but also an issue of balance. I like that stunts can move trappings around but I can't really see those specific trappings moving, especially moving the stress box trapping from one skill to another stress box skill.
My question:
What do you guys think? How would you handle running these or would you simply say, "No?"
Edit: He's altered the "presence for mental stress" to "Discipline for mental stress." Still not sure how I feel about it. I can see the justification a bit better but still want outside opinions.
First stunt:
Use endurance to defend against physical attacks.
Second stunt:
Use presence instead of conviction for determining mental stress boxes.
My issues:
With the first, how do you justify that? That you just eat the damage to be awesome? That's reflected in stress boxes, not defending against it. I can't see the justification on it.
With the second, again there's the issue of justification but also an issue of balance. I like that stunts can move trappings around but I can't really see those specific trappings moving, especially moving the stress box trapping from one skill to another stress box skill.
My question:
What do you guys think? How would you handle running these or would you simply say, "No?"
Edit: He's altered the "presence for mental stress" to "Discipline for mental stress." Still not sure how I feel about it. I can see the justification a bit better but still want outside opinions.