Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Piotr1600

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6
1
DF Reference Collection / Re: Dark influences on Harry
« on: March 20, 2012, 07:44:24 PM »
In that case, Harry should have shot Morgan in the back during Summer Knight.  Morgan was a wizard and threat - he might not have been an active danger to Harry at the time but he was an existing threat to Harry.

And he should have arranged for a deadly accident for Marcone - who is also a threat.  And (by extension) Hendricks.  And he should have killed that White Court Vampire that was stalking him before Thomas revealed that he was Harry's brother.  And Fitz - Fitz should have died for shooting at Molly.

But Harry isn't a killer who neutralises threats like that.  He's deal with a danger while the danger exist and then tries to prevent the danger from coming back.  At least that's who he was before he killed a woman he loved to protect the daughter he never knew.   That's who he still was when he didn't have glans interfering with his thought process.  Will he be the same person in a few books time? Who knows?

Those dark influences keep adding up and he hasn't had the chance to interact with any light influences (Micheal, Maggie, etc) for a while.

Richard
Neither Morgan nor Marcone are active threats of that magnitude.
Morgan is/was bound by the laws of wizardry. he was a dangerous opponent but he played by the rules.  Morgan is a big, mean dog inside a fence, wearing a collar and chained in a dog run.
Marcone is just not that much of a threat to Harry. He certainly wasn't seeking Harry out to destroy him at any point in the series. Marcone is a wolf in the woods.


Cassius on the other hand, was perfectly happy to use magic to try to kill. Cassius was not bound by the laws of magic, had obviously been planning on killing Harry for quite some time, and he would not be stopped short of his own death. Cassius is a big, mean hungry rabid dog that has gotten inside your house, and thinks you look yummy, and that you make interesting noises when you're in pain.

2
DF Reference Collection / Re: Dark influences on Harry
« on: March 20, 2012, 05:49:27 PM »
A little OT:
Harry killing Cassius can't truly be considered a "cold blooded killing" in my opinion.
The simple fact that Cassius was a competent sorcerer means that even if he was on his way out in a month (or even the next few minutes) Cassius was an existential threat to Harry until Cassius was dead.  In my opinion, that makes it - however cold or not it might have been - self-defense.

But I do agree the killing did leave a mark on Harry - because I'm pretty sure that death curses leave marks...

3
Site Suggestions & Support / Re: Response time?
« on: November 14, 2011, 12:14:22 AM »
Still having really slow response.

Some  things are a bit different - Usually the first 3-4 pages or so load OK, and then after that it just slows waaaaaay down - like between 30 sec and 1 minute to load a page. Does this consistently with both home and work accounts, and on different browsers...

Soooo frustrating!   >:(

4
Site Suggestions & Support / Re: Response time?
« on: August 12, 2011, 09:04:47 PM »
Hmmm... If I hit "reply" it takes anywhere from 10 to 30+ seconds for a new screen to load, from either home or work accounts.
Occasioanlly everything will be as  fast as everything else, then... non-responsive.

I've opened tabs and had great response times from other sites while still waiting here...

Oh well... I'm sure its probably something on my end, but it seems weird.

5
Site Suggestions & Support / Response time?
« on: August 12, 2011, 04:22:03 PM »
Are the boards being extra-pokey for anyone but me?

I've tried from multiple computers on different connections/providers, and things just seem considerably slower responding for about the last couple of weeks or so.

6
As described in the book, Childs struck me with an odd vibe.

But I haven't really completely parsed *why* just yet.

7
Site Suggestions & Support / Re: Miscategorized Threads
« on: July 19, 2011, 09:07:53 PM »
Hi Priscellie -

I'm pretty sure that this:
http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,27176.0.html     (New season of "Trueblood")

ought to be over in Media, not DF Books...

8
Thanks a lot, Serack! /sarcasm   ;D
(Now instead of mindlessly playing Minecraft and continue work building my all-glass mountain range this evening, I get to delve into the historical relationships between symbology, language & writing.)
I'll let you know if I find anything... interesting.

9
#1
Sandra Marling is usually pointed to as the main orchestrator for all things nasty that happened at Splattercon since she motivated Molly to use fear, and people point out that she didn't touch Harry.  However, if she were powerful enough to knock out the lights and set up the cold wards around the Fetch attacks, she might have trouble using a cell phone:

This doesn't definitively show that she wasn't the one throwing around magic but.  It's a strike against her, and indicates there was another player in the background, that might have been using her as a cutout.  
If Sandra Marling is non-human (or potentially half human) that would answer the cell phone use issue.
I'm not saying that's how it was, just that it is a possibility...


Love the WAG about Rawlins (though I don't actually buy it.  ;D ) but the premise that there's an infiltrator from the Bad GuysTM planted/working in SI is probably worth examining, particularly if we assume that Rawlins is a Renfield/thrall, rather than an actual power.
It could/would just mean that he reported Harry's preparations to... someone else... like say a handler for the 'event', named, just perhaps, Sandra...

10
I'll have a lot more to say within the week, but there's another dimension here for the "communications channel" in that I'm pretty sure that Michael was already leaving Chicago on a calling before Harry even spoke with him after getting the Gatekeeper's message.  Implying that someone on that side of things had a toe in the mud too.
Maybe more than one toe. <LOL>
Michael out to do some WG-work is *available* to come back via the ways, and chop up outsiders & RCVs, and essentially prevent his daughter from getting the chop.

Because if things had progressed the way they were going, the *least* bad thing that would have happened wold have been to make Harry/Molly fugitives from the WC (assuming they could even get away somehow.)
And it goes downhill rather precipitously from there, in terms of "bad outcomes"... (Imagine the repercussions of Michael & Harry trying to save Molly via force. Ugly doesn't even begin to cover it...)

IMO, I think Molly has her critical part to play yet. Or perhaps she has *more* critical parts to play. She's already sort-of responsible for Harry becoming a much better mage as it is.
Just the re-examination of the basics of wizardry she forced him to make (to be a good teacher) has really increased his skill level already.


On the other side, if your base theory is true, then the odds that the Gatekeeper is a Black Hat of some kind go down quite considerably...

11
Wow - why didn't I see this earlier?
This is awesome-good theoretical work knnn!


To throw a little more fuel on, consider this...
If we extend that future vision just a little bit, it makes more sense to me that Raschid would be more concerned with saving massive quantities of WC casualties/fatalities than he would be concerned about one still very minor warlockette.

By moving the pieces just so, he* arranged for Michael to accompany a whole lot of WC personnel thru the NN back to Chicago - thus preventing the RCV+ Outsider ambush from becoming a rout & a slaughter. 
In PG, Eb himself seems to think that the RCVs combined with the outsiders they encountered would have been much more deadly without a KOC there to deal with 'tentacles and things'.

While I'm certain (from his actions / word choice) that Raschid was offended by what the Merlin was intent on doing to Molly,  IMO the real goal was probably to save all those young wardens - and the experienced wizards accompanying them. It was also an effective action against outsiders, which is admittedly something that Raschid has a professional interest in... :)

So, I'm positing that the Gatekeeper was warning Harry about black magic as part of a goal to save WC lives AND act against outsiders. Saving Molly may have been just a nice bonus... 

It is a case of wheels within wheels...



*As food for thought: Were two seemingly unrelated plans (Mab and Gatekeeper) that just happened to wind up supporting each other quite well a mere coincidence?
It is possible I suppose, but if there is some kind of communications channel between the Gatekeeper and Mab (which I have suspected at least somewhat since the Gatekeeper turned up with that chunk of stone table AND when Mab recognized his anti-Fae eye-unguent) then I think it hangs together somewhat better...


12
DF Reference Collection / Re: Harry's Power Ups (Changes Spoilers)
« on: June 20, 2011, 06:28:55 PM »
Except Murphy.  She's been offered power, yes, but she declines it.  She can take up a Sword any time she wants, but she won't.  Harry has to push and prod her to take it up any time he needs her to.  

Murphy Started out in Storm Front in charge of Special Investigations.  So, not as important as Homicide or Vice or anything, but it was her own department and she was in charge.  Then she lost that and became a mere grunt, and now she has lost that too.

Gard even offered her a shot at working for Monoc, where she might have gained special supernatural training, access to large resources, and who knows what else. (Yes, that last sentence was pure speculation on my part)

Power and influence in the mortal world? Lost.  Supernatural power.  Declined, repeatedly.  Murphy is on a downward slope.  In a series that has Free Will vs. Power as one of its themes, Murphy has chosen Free Will.

EDIT: I just read what I wrote.  Holy crap, the only time she does take power (the sword) is when Harry influences her.  He really does influence people to become stronger.

Even when it costs them a little Free Will and an angel turns them into a sock puppet.
Agreed, but with some caveats...
Murphy-as-standard-vanilla-cop was relatively powerless vs. supernatural threats so long as she stayed within the current legal (and mental!) world-view.
She only got to be able to be effective when Harry changed her worldview (essentially educating her about the real supernatural)

Murphy as "not-normal" cop (awareness of supernatural milieu and a much closer friendship with Harry) was able to put the boot in a faery queen's (Aurora) avatar, distract/disable a supernatural assassin, stare down a 2 story tall Gruff, shoot the crap out of RCVs without panicking, and so on. That all comes from association with Harry and getting to know his character intimately.
She broke multiple state & federal laws essentially just to help Harry.

Now ex-cop Murphy has access to a VASTLY powerful artifact, and yet is
(click to show/hide)
. (Aftermath spoiler)  

Is she comfortable having/holding all that power? No, I think your sock puppet comment is dead-on & I think that's exactly why she tries to minimize using anything that is not pure vanilla - there are costs and side effects after all...

13
DF Reference Collection / Re: Harry's Power Ups (Changes Spoilers)
« on: June 20, 2011, 03:22:36 PM »
Serack - I LOVE this!

One thing to possibly consider... We have WOJ that one of Harry's primary 'character powers' (exclusive of in-story powers) is his ability to act as a catalyst to make *others* more that they were or (extrapolating a bit) perhaps more than they could have been before.  Does that impact or change how we look at / think about Harry's allies?

Toot may be a good example, I think.  Something about his interactions with Harry have changed him from simple dew-drop fairy to a creature with some sense of loyalty and ambition - which is sort of odd behavior, at least from what we've seen.

To know how much more powerful *Harry* gets we might need to consider how his *allies* get more powerful/knowledgeable as well...

Thoughts?

14
Author Craft / Re: Cool words
« on: May 20, 2011, 05:56:17 AM »
And in honor of "Cool words", and due to something I ran into today (metaphorically)  I'd like to add the subcategory of "having something to do with indicating irritation, and or anger..."

pique
peeved
waspish
rancor
vituperation
wrath (and cousin "wroth")
ire (and the closely related "Irish")
fulminating (usually paired with "anger", or in another context a chemical compound :) )


15
Author Craft / Re: Cool words
« on: May 18, 2011, 08:45:04 PM »
Whenever are you not silly Piotr?  ;D
Good morning by the way, how goes your day?
Uhhh... Ya know Snowy, I don't actually recall the last time I *wasn't* silly...
Probably the last time Herself quietly threatened to skin me alive if I was awful in public.
I wasn't too worried though - I can run faster scared than she can mad!  ;D
Until I got to wondering if I could stay scared longer than she can stay mad...
So I behaved(1) myself.

And I am ridiculously better than I deserve.

How about you? Are you recovered from the move, all unpacked, settled in, and everything OK?







(1)For certain values of "behaved". Obviously not badly enough to get skinned...

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6