1
DF Reference Collection / Re: Dark influences on Harry
« on: March 20, 2012, 07:44:24 PM »In that case, Harry should have shot Morgan in the back during Summer Knight. Morgan was a wizard and threat - he might not have been an active danger to Harry at the time but he was an existing threat to Harry.Neither Morgan nor Marcone are active threats of that magnitude.
And he should have arranged for a deadly accident for Marcone - who is also a threat. And (by extension) Hendricks. And he should have killed that White Court Vampire that was stalking him before Thomas revealed that he was Harry's brother. And Fitz - Fitz should have died for shooting at Molly.
But Harry isn't a killer who neutralises threats like that. He's deal with a danger while the danger exist and then tries to prevent the danger from coming back. At least that's who he was before he killed a woman he loved to protect the daughter he never knew. That's who he still was when he didn't have glans interfering with his thought process. Will he be the same person in a few books time? Who knows?
Those dark influences keep adding up and he hasn't had the chance to interact with any light influences (Micheal, Maggie, etc) for a while.
Richard
Morgan is/was bound by the laws of wizardry. he was a dangerous opponent but he played by the rules. Morgan is a big, mean dog inside a fence, wearing a collar and chained in a dog run.
Marcone is just not that much of a threat to Harry. He certainly wasn't seeking Harry out to destroy him at any point in the series. Marcone is a wolf in the woods.
Cassius on the other hand, was perfectly happy to use magic to try to kill. Cassius was not bound by the laws of magic, had obviously been planning on killing Harry for quite some time, and he would not be stopped short of his own death. Cassius is a big, mean hungry rabid dog that has gotten inside your house, and thinks you look yummy, and that you make interesting noises when you're in pain.