271
Site Suggestions & Support / Re: Officially ticked off
« on: February 29, 2012, 02:37:04 AM »At the rate you're going, you'll be ahead of Shecky before Christmas
Nobody's yappier than I am. I'm not proud of it per se; it's just a fact.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
At the rate you're going, you'll be ahead of Shecky before Christmas
Thanks for the replys. In the past no one mentioned having to have 100 posts, that should be in posted somewhere in the setup, ya think?
I've only got two actors that I can even remotely see for Michael in my head - Tom Selleck (iffy) and Liam Neeson (definitely). I can't think of any other actors who are the right age/height/physicality and have the gravitas to pull it off.
That would be what's causing that softness your feeling.
I don't think the issue is with privileging certain viewpoints (proud vs wanting to change) over others. That's just diversity of opinion. It's more of an issue when there's a long pattern of people (particularly people who don't have disabilities) writing about how curing disabilities makes disabled characters normal/happier/better etc.
It's not an argument that can be applied to individual works (like, say, Vorkosigan) because all things can, theoretically, be justified in the text. It's more about the broader context and implications of what you're writing, which can be something you ignore, but is still not something you can avoid, if you see what I'm saying.
Back on topic, one popular character with disabilities is Miles Vorkosigan. Pre-natal poisoning left him with long bones that had the consistancy of chalk. (Kind of like Mr. Glass in the Bruce Willis flick "Unbreakable.") He's hunchbacked, and breaks very, very easilly. He's also clinically bi-polar as hell.
Indeed! It tripled Jim's readership!