106
DF Spoilers / Re: Will Ramirez ever get laid?...
« on: May 25, 2018, 02:57:24 PM »
Is that not one of the things The Winter Lady molly now owes Ramirez??
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Exactly why I am worried for the next books. Maggie will become more important.Oh yes, the real proof of this to me is Mouse, whose obviously got an agenda of his own, is now her personal guard dog. The monster under the bed was probably as real as Dresden thought.(woj of things only kids can see.)
feels like Harry Dresden is walking a similar path to MerlinPath being the operative word here.(one I think rai can appreciate)But it's folly to limit it to simply Arthurian mythos or Merlin in said mythos. That's part and parcel why the Hades parallel scene was put in, to show a wider and wider scope of connections. GK and his appearance vs his domain being across the surface of the moon and other associations as a likely Horus put's Egyptian mythos firmly on the map too... how many is this now... Arthur, Christian, Egyptian, Greek/roman(I'd categorically have them the same).... and Norse? ^.- Mmm that's five directly connected mythos, until we see a sixth perhaps the five timelines entwined works quite well?
Thus Baldr had to remain in the underworld, not to emerge until after Ragnarök, when he and his brother Höðr would be reconciled and rule the new earth together with Thor's sons.Mmm...
Unless he's already Thor, and it's part of his full cup.He's more the Loki to Marcones Thor... although mayhaps he's Baldor instead
There is the possibility that Thor no longer has his Mantle... Perhaps the foreshadowing being shown here is that Charity will have it one day, and kicking ass along side her Sword wielding husband. I guess Michael could get it but it seems more like Charity if Jim used foreshadowing.Dude, you know who Mike the Mechanic could be don't you? Whom the Mechanic(whom I wanna say was Mike) was in Adventures of Babysitting...? I've long thought that his fate, especially since we have the... idk their names, the things Etri was, as the dwarvish smiths.
That's my point. Odin and Loki are still alive. Ergo, Ragnarok has not yet occurred.Sure there is, there's plenty of reason... but how deep down the rabbit hole can you really go though? There's no reason to appose the idea either, so unless I can get to the root of why you do we'll just dance all night lol.
wut.
I think it's a case of JB's classical use of the word Catholic. As in universal, all-encompassing. All the pantheons are part of the whole. Some might overlap, while others stand apart. But they're all connected at the root.
None of that means that Ragnarok has already occurred, though. There's no reason to believe that Odin died and came back. There's no reason to believe Vadderung is Thor. Are either possible? Sure. But I don't think there's been evidence for either. Just because the Sidhe change hosts doesn't mean everyone does, or can, or will.
I don't see the link. For starters, different pantheons. Also, I'm not convinced the Mothers are utterly incapable of visiting Earth. They certainly don't do it regularly, but that could be chalked up to them not wanting to warp reality, or Mother Winter not wanting to travel without her "walking stick" and Mother Summer refraining from doing so for the sake of balance.*snickers to self* different pantheons? My dear Sir we have in the Fae make up no less than 3 distinct pantheon's all colliding into one, lets not forget Hecate is Greek, and the two have a direct connection to the Queens based upon Hades own defense systems. Odin is Norse but is mysteriously subplanted into a largely irish mythology which Bob's fairy wars directly links to the Vanir and aesir. Separate Pantheons indeed... and besides the noticeable lack of the main greek/roman deities who later were reformed(a reforming of identity would certainly be a Godly death/twilight btw) We have Hades talk with Harry to point to a little ahh Nemfection apparent in their continued actions and we Have Thomas's soulgaze(to which I've already well connected the heirs of the sons of Ares and Aphrodite) to show the Greek pantheon is perhaps in absentee now. It suffered the same Decay as showcased in Denton's actual mind. But Thomas's soulgaze was not purely a representation of his own mind, but of his identity as a whole.
That's all an interpretation, and one that makes sense. But it's not fact. For the Norse pantheon, there's only one apocalypse (Ragnarok) that calls for the deaths of Odin and Loki and Thor, at least two of which are still alive regardless of the theory.*thinking man pose* Do we have any other thing for history and mythology..?
Now, if you wanted to argue that the series is in the middle of Ragnarok, and Aldar Rok has passed but Tiva Rok hasn't, it might make things more plausible. I don't know the specifics of the series of events, but maybe it's possible.
Yup, though I maintain that Chitzen Itza could work, with the Ambient Life of a dense Jungle replacing the need to living humans, while the same accumulation of angry warrior spirits is already present.But.. what if it's actually the mortal choice that they're feeding on in the spell, that most delicate part of the soul only humans possess?
You're assuming that Ragnarok already occurred, but WoJ is that Loki is still locked up. Ergo, he's still alive, rather than being dead like he's supposed to be after Ragnarok. Everything points to Ragnarok not having occurred yet.Many Ragnaroks have happened, or at least one I can evidence, Going back to Bob's original explanation of the queens whom used to be. They don't exist on our plain, can't anymore. Because they are primal spirits of what was, they are literally the Ghosts of a previous epoch. (You might point to the same thing for Hades and why in this age he can no longer effect fate. He admitted he could before by default then, noting a considerable difference then in how he can interact with our world now by comparison.) They birthed the new Age, also why they are now 'Mothers' despite new evidence pointing to the Queen as the one whose giving birth, they already gave birth.
Again, what sources material? I haven't found many translated texts.