ParanetOnline

McAnally's (The Community Pub) => Author Craft => Topic started by: LizW65 on December 03, 2009, 10:14:37 PM

Title: This Year's Bad Sex In Literature Winners
Post by: LizW65 on December 03, 2009, 10:14:37 PM
HIlarious, and probably not suitable for work:
http://www.literaryreview.co.uk/badsexpassages.html
And the winner:
http://www.literaryreview.co.uk/badsex.html
Title: Re: This Year's Bad Sex In Literature Winners
Post by: Matrix Refugee (formerly Morraeon) on December 03, 2009, 10:47:47 PM
Ugh... I'm a total virgin, but even I know sex ain't like what they're describing. Gaaah... if it were, it would turn anyone with sense into a celibate and we'd have to start growing babies in bottles like in Brave New World.

Anyone who uses the word "pistons" in a sex scene has to turn in their creative license, stat.
Title: Re: This Year's Bad Sex In Literature Winners
Post by: Murphy's Stunt Double on December 03, 2009, 11:06:57 PM
Don't tell JB that. He loves a challenge!  ;) :D
Title: Re: This Year's Bad Sex In Literature Winners
Post by: Kris_W on December 03, 2009, 11:21:14 PM
Worse yet, he'd make it work and then everyone would be trying it.

 :-[
Title: Re: This Year's Bad Sex In Literature Winners
Post by: Murphy's Stunt Double on December 03, 2009, 11:36:09 PM
Yep, that's EXACTLY what would happen!  :D
Title: Re: This Year's Bad Sex In Literature Winners
Post by: Jen'ari on December 03, 2009, 11:40:58 PM
ROTFL classic!!
Title: Re: This Year's Bad Sex In Literature Winners
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on December 04, 2009, 01:15:29 AM
Anyone who uses the word "pistons" in a sex scene has to turn in their creative license, stat.

But what about all the Terminator and Robocop fanfic writers ?
Title: Re: This Year's Bad Sex In Literature Winners
Post by: Matrix Refugee (formerly Morraeon) on December 04, 2009, 01:50:57 AM
But what about all the Terminator and Robocop fanfic writers ?

Heh, that's the exception that helps define the rule...
Title: Re: This Year's Bad Sex In Literature Winners
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on December 04, 2009, 02:20:03 AM
Heh, that's the exception that helps define the rule...

The word that I am looking for here, I think, is "RoboCopulation".
Title: Re: This Year's Bad Sex In Literature Winners
Post by: LizW65 on December 04, 2009, 02:44:07 PM
Hey Neurovore:  I know you've written favorably about a book called The Kindly Ones in other threads; I trust it isn't the same one as this year's winner of the Soft Boiled Eggs in Sex Writing Award?
Title: Re: This Year's Bad Sex In Literature Winners
Post by: the neurovore of Zur-En-Aargh on December 04, 2009, 04:10:43 PM
Hey Neurovore:  I know you've written favorably about a book called The Kindly Ones in other threads; I trust it isn't the same one as this year's winner of the Soft Boiled Eggs in Sex Writing Award?

Almost certainly not; the one I have in mind is a Melissa Scott from 1987.
Title: Re: This Year's Bad Sex In Literature Winners
Post by: KarlTenBrew on December 07, 2009, 11:48:55 PM
Certain analogies, if used at all, must be used sparingly and purposefully to define a small portion of the behavior, not the entire act.  Like 'pistons' ::)

Also, somebody really needs better translators...
Title: Re: This Year's Bad Sex In Literature Winners
Post by: Kali on December 08, 2009, 10:21:59 AM
The word that I am looking for here, I think, is "RoboCopulation".

I am intrigued by your ideas, and would like to follow you on Twitter.
Title: Re: This Year's Bad Sex In Literature Winners
Post by: meg_evonne on December 16, 2009, 11:43:19 PM
I love this!  Now--honestly, would you show up to get your award?  I think I might, just to see who showed up!!!

And LOL  robocopulation   new classic!  Somehow I think I need to go back and rewatch those Star Gate shows with the replicators....were some of them? ....Well, you never know what some bored CGI designer might be doing....   ::)