Author Topic: Battle ground questions  (Read 13272 times)

Offline Conspiracy Theorist

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 2981
    • View Profile
Re: Battle ground questions
« Reply #15 on: April 24, 2022, 10:36:47 PM »
It is influenced and doesn’t require a coin, it does mean though that Uriel and his agents are allowed to act to counter the influence, and they did.

Offline g33k

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 2376
    • View Profile
Re: Battle ground questions
« Reply #16 on: April 25, 2022, 12:28:22 AM »
Revenge is evil?
Yes, it is.

  What happened to "an eye for an eye"?
Justice is separate, and not evil.

  I'd say that when Harry knelt and cried in shame is the part where he was out of character. The revenge part is on par.
Acting out of hatred, rage, fear, etc...  That's all very Sith, not at all Jedi.

Harry realized he had slipped over into Sithmode.

And we *know* how the Dresdenverse feels about that particular split.

Offline Mira

  • Needs A Life
  • ***
  • Posts: 24359
    • View Profile
Re: Battle ground questions
« Reply #17 on: April 25, 2022, 11:18:55 AM »
The scene in Battleground when Butters and Sanya stopping Harry from killing Rudolph is a parallel of the scene in the short story "The Warrior" when Harry stops Michael from continuing to beat an unconscious Douglas (possibly killing him) after the priest had kidnapped Michael's daugher Alicia.

Would the Fidelacchius of Butters have burned Michael in that moment?

I think it would have. Harry didn't do evil, in the emotion of the moment he was about to do evil just like Michael was, to kill in anger and judgement. Judgement belongs to the Almighty, Michael of all people knows that, he is a Holy Knight, yet he lost it because of the pain that man caused his child. The Sword stopped Harry with a brimstone smelling burn to remind him of what he was about to do and bring him back to himself and sanity.  Just like Harry stopped Michael when he was beating Father Steven to death with that baseball bat.  Both Harry and Michael in that moment had good reason to want to kill, angry enough to kill, and lost it.  What is telling about both men, isn't the burn on Harry's arm or Harry able to control Michael finally, is their reaction afterward.. Both Michael and Harry felt intense shame and remorse,once they came to their senses.  Harry continues to feel shame for the rest of the book every time he feel a twinge of pain from that burn.  Evil men don't feel shame or remorse, they just continue to do evil..  That is what redemption is about, we all make mistakes, when we realize it we try to make up for it.  Or if you don't want to go that route, why does a vet tie down an animal in severe pain?  To prevent the animal from striking out in it's pain, from hurting itself further, and hurting the person trying to take away it's pain. Sanya and Butters were trying to stop Harry from striking out in his pain, and got hurt in the process.  They understood that and forgave him on the spot because in that moment he wasn't responsible.  The Sword, which is also about Redemption with a capital "R" was able to get through Harry's pain where they could not, and stop Harry from hurting himself and others..  That fact isn't lost on Harry, he feels the shame of his reaction and remorse that he hurt people he cares about who were trying to help him in that moment.  Those are not the emotions of a destroyer or an evil person.
« Last Edit: April 25, 2022, 11:25:16 AM by Mira »

Offline Conspiracy Theorist

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 2981
    • View Profile
Re: Battle ground questions
« Reply #18 on: April 25, 2022, 12:27:01 PM »
If Harry had killed Rudy, Harry would have considered that evil after the event, crossing a line he was not previously prepared to do, kill a mortal in cold blood, not in self-defence. That’s what Sanya and Butters was trying to prevent, Harry flipping over into being a Destroyer by his own definition.

Offline morriswalters

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 2547
    • View Profile
Re: Battle ground questions
« Reply #19 on: April 25, 2022, 01:18:25 PM »
The scene in Battleground when Butters and Sanya stopping Harry from killing Rudolph is a parallel of the scene in the short story "The Warrior" when Harry stops Michael from continuing to beat an unconscious Douglas (possibly killing him) after the priest had kidnapped Michael's daugher Alicia.

Would the Fidelacchius of Butters have burned Michael in that moment?
Apples and oranges. No one dies and Harry never has to raise a hand to Michael.  Michael is angry but not out of  control.

In the real world this is the type of anger you see when a man kills his wife because of some perceived slight. It's irrational. When you get the internal view of what Rudolph is thinking he feels disgust and revulsion at what he has  done. Harry feels joy watching Rudolph die. Feeling the bones breaking. Watching as Rudolph urinates on himself out of fear. The abject superiority of his vision of hate versus both Sanya's and Butter's.

Offline Mira

  • Needs A Life
  • ***
  • Posts: 24359
    • View Profile
Re: Battle ground questions
« Reply #20 on: April 25, 2022, 02:51:41 PM »
If Harry had killed Rudy, Harry would have considered that evil after the event, crossing a line he was not previously prepared to do, kill a mortal in cold blood, not in self-defence. That’s what Sanya and Butters was trying to prevent, Harry flipping over into being a Destroyer by his own definition.

Yes, and he was both ashamed for his actions and grateful that Butters and Sanya tried and did stop him.. Proves that he isn't a "Destroyer," because he stopped and was ashamed, but of course in typical Harry fashion he will put himself in the worst possible light.
Quote
Apples and oranges. No one dies and Harry never has to raise a hand to Michael.  Michael is angry but not out of  control.
Um, I think you need to go back and reread "The Warrior."  Michael was proceeding to beat Father Douglas to death with a baseball bat.  A baseball bat can be a lethal weapon in the hands of anyone, especially a strong trained warrior like Michael.  No one died because Harry was able to stop Michael from killing him.  Michael says that, heck Uriel says that, because Michael was out of control and would have killed Father Douglas.  It wasn't," well, I will wack him here and there to teach him a lesson", no, in that moment Michael wanted to kill him and would have.  The "control blows" in contrast was when Harry wacked Cassius, broke his knee and ankle I believe, but didn't try to kill him.
Quote
In the real world this is the type of anger you see when a man kills his wife because of some perceived slight. It's irrational. When you get the internal view of what Rudolph is thinking he feels disgust and revulsion at what he has  done. Harry feels joy watching Rudolph die. Feeling the bones breaking. Watching as Rudolph urinates on himself out of fear. The abject superiority of his vision of hate versus both Sanya's and Butter's.

Yes, it is irrational, but that is what happens when there is an extreme emotional response to an event.  The person acting irrational in that moment isn't responsible because there was nothing rational about the act.

Um, Rudolph didn't die, as Sanya and Butters tell Harry, Rudolph will face justice at some point. Also what you are describing as "joy" on the part of Harry is in the moment.  He just witnessed his beloved killed for no logical reason, he is exhausted, under extreme pressure, he loses it, he wants to go after the man who "murdered" in his mind his beloved.  He is judge, jury, he wants the man to suffer for what he has done, it is a human response.. It is the same thing Michael felt when he was beating the living shit out of Father Douglas for making his child and family suffer.  You can call that joy, but I've heard victims and families of victims of brutal crimes voice the same things, the pleasure and "joy" as you put it to see the one or ones who did it suffer in horrible ways like their loved ones.  Are these blood thirsty destroyers?  No, most of them are good people who suffered a horrible loss in a brutal way and want pay back.  This kind of thing is difficult to see in a subjective way when you are the victim.

Offline Yuillegan

  • White Council
  • Posty McPostington
  • *****
  • Posts: 1384
  • Forum Moderator
    • View Profile
Re: Battle ground questions
« Reply #21 on: April 26, 2022, 07:05:19 AM »
I have just finished rereading Battleground.. I was less impressed with it the second time around, but many of my original sore points are the same. I don't know if anyone posted the answers before..
1. Who were the older wardens of Demonreach? And how did they trap beings that according to Harry, were much stronger than Ethniu? And when? And what exactly is stronger than a Titan?
2 .How did Justine get super-strength? There wasn't any mention of that in earlier possessions by Nemesis.
3. In Turncoat, Justine told the captain of the wardens about Thomas being Harry's brother. Effectively putting itself at risk of losing a favorable position in the White Court. Also in ghost story, Uriel shows Thomas and Justine to Harry, assuring him that his brother will be alright. So the archangel didn't know? Which makes me think that "Justine being Nemfected" wasn't in Jim's plan back then. It lacks consistency.
4. Why, after a few chapters of telling us that the Winter Knight's office was created to actually manifest a banner and lead troops in battle, do we find Marcone manifesting a banner as well?
5. How the hell did Marcone get enough juice to stand off a Titan for a few minutes when all other gods and immortals lost in a couple of seconds? Marcone was always purely vanilla. Zero magical ability. Yet he picks up a coin with a sorcery sensie fallen angel and he becomes a wizard? Older evidence suggests that it doesn't work like that. I remember in Death Masks Jim said that "over centuries, even a small scale talent develops teeth". Marcone didn't have that to start with. And he only had the coin for a few years.
Finally, and this is not a question: I never liked Murphy as a character, and I'm glad she's finally dead, but the scene with the knights stopping Harry from making a Rudolph Burger - and Harry crying afterwards and regretting attacking him- is just horrible and overblown. I mean.. His gf was shot dead in front of him, he can do something about it, I think this is the time to start cutting off bits of Rudolph, and it's quite childish to expect otherwise.
I liked the scene at the end of the movie "Seven" much better. Much more believable.

1. Kemmler, Merlin Emrys (the OG Merlin) are the only two confirmed other Wardens. Jim has ruled out any of the current Senior Council. Other possible Wardens include Margaret Le Fey, Justin DuMorne and Simon Pietrovich. They do what wizards do i.e. use tools to gain leverage over much stronger opponents. They learn about their opponents, find out weaknesses, and use whatever tools they can come up with. Plus, it's a pretty standard binding for any being once it gets onto Demonreach's domain (i.e. the shores of Lake Michigan). Some have speculated that initially they had to capture smaller beings as it is the beings in Demonreach that actually provide the magical muscle that Demonreach uses...but that's just a theory. Of course, I suspect many times the various Wardens failed, sometimes with lethal results (Jim said most Wardens leave the job feet first). Considering (depending on how you look at it) Demonreach has existed possibly before life existed on Earth, perhaps the Wardens have been locking up monsters for as long as there have been Wardens to do so (so at least as long as humanity, maybe longer depending on time travel).

There are a few things stronger than Titans. Ethniu clearly isn't the biggest or strongest Titan either (presumably her father Balor was stronger) and I suspect Vadderung/Odin was stronger at his peak given the respect she shows him. Archangels are also stronger than most presumably, and some of the Outsiders like He Who Walks Behind (and maybe some of the other Walkers). The Old Ones are probably stronger (and I think some of them are in Demonreach) given they rule the Outsiders. Of course, strength isn't a straight line thing so it's a bit hard to answer.

2. We've never seen Nemesis get sprung quite like it was with Justine. Curiously, the only other time was with Cat Sith on the same boat over Lake Michigan very close to Demonreach. I wonder if that's something. In any case, we judged Cat Sith's strength to be in line with the Elder Malks so we don't really know if Nemesis made Cat Sith stronger when attacking Harry. But it doesn't seem all that odd to me that Nemesis can empower it's hosts.

3. I think you are correct in that Justine being infected by Nemesis wasn't always the plan, hence some of the apparent inconsistencies. That said, Jim has answered the Archangel Uriel problem (i.e. that Uriel didn't detect Nemesis earlier). Jim said that Nemesis (He Who Walks Beside) cannot be detected except for logic and reason, as it is a creature of the Outside i.e. a creature of elemental chaos. Uriel plays by the rules of Creation. Nemesis isn't so easily bound. Jim once said that He Who Walks Behind is a peer of Uriel, but has all sorts of strange limits about when and how he can use his strength. Seems to be Nemesis is similarly limited, yet also being a Walker may be able to fool very powerful beings like Uriel. I suspect it's also a Free Will thing, and Uriel doesn't have Free Will.

4. Did Marcone actually manifest a banner, or did Harry just see it that way? Hard to tell without being in Marcone's POV. As far as I am aware, no Fallen or wizard has displayed that particular power. Indeed, we've only seen Harry display it (although I suspect other mantles and higher beings might be able to do similar things...and I wouldn't be surprised if Gard could do something like that).

5. This is one of the most fascinating questions, and I think there are several possible answers. Firstly, the most likely answer is that Jim needed Marcone to do so and therefore in his mind Marcone had enough ticker to do so. But from an in-universe point-of-view I would say between the Last Titan being weakened and Marcone becoming FAR more skilled than most wizards (including Harry, according to Jim) Marcone was able to do what would appear impossible. Marcone wasn't just trying to match her with raw strength either I imagine (that's how Harry does it, but most wizards seem to be smarter/need other ways). I suspect he was diverting or transferring the energy of her strikes (both physical and magical might) away from himself, in a sort of aikido-esque fashion. He was spinning multiple shields of each hand (where Harry normally has just the one big shield on one hand). Marcone's tactics likely were also in conjunction with Thorned Namshiel, a Fallen Angel, who would know EXACTLY how to fight off another spiritual heavy weight. I mean, Namshiel and Ethniu know one another (possibly from before Creation). Not to mention, Marcone has repeatedly shown that he doesn't fight things head-on like Harry does. So it's very much his style to not try and arm-wrestle Ethniu. Plus, he would have had a certain amount of Hellfire to help (which as we know, grants more strength to the user's magic).

Another thing to note is that we actually don't know that Marcone had no magical talent prior. According to Jim, any human can learn magic. Namshiel clearly helped Marcone fast-track, and Marcone is FAR more driven and organised than Harry, so I can imagine he has spent far more time developing than Harry has in recent years (given Harry has been on the back foot and learning on the go for the same period). But suppose for a second Marcone actually has always had magical talent. It would change everything. I mean, he knew EXACTLY what a soul gaze was in Storm Front. He actually got the better of Harry in that moment. And if you examine the language that Jim uses with Marcone over the years he often says things like "He pulled out a knife so fast it appeared as if by magic" and such. This is a writing technique. Now he might be just saying Marcone is exceptionally quick. But considering how often he has said that...it is quite possible he was hinting Marcone was actually magically inclined. It's a reinforcement/foreshadowing thing. And Marcone works in the shadows, unlike Harry. He would make damn sure most don't know about that hidden talent. It's an ace up the sleeve. Think about how long he managed to keep his status as a Knight of the Blackened Denarius secret, that he was the bearer of Thorned Namshiel's Coin.

But it's just a theory.

6. I think Harry agreed with you at the time. I think he was very prepared to kill Rudolph in a horrible fashion. Consider what he did to Bianca's Court for trying to take Susan. Consider his past actions like annihilating the Red Court for kidnapping and trying to murder his kid (and indirectly the death of his ex). Consider what he did (or believes he did) to the man who enthralled his first love and tried to enthrall and then murder (maybe) him. Consider what he did the ghouls that killed the two warden trainees. Consider what he did to the killer of his mother (and perhaps his father). Consider what he did to every enemy that has crossed him or killed or tried to kill a friend or even somewhat ally of his. Pretty much always righteous kills. But almost always it just creates more, unintended, consequences.

The point of the scene was to try and help Harry go a different way. Sure, I wanted him to kill Rudy as much as anyone. But considering the Knights intervened...I'd say Harry's soul was in the balance. It's no accident that Jim wrote the Jedi-Sith moment with Harry firing lightning at Butters (like a Sith) and Butter's using his Fidelacchius (in lightsabre form) to deflect it - it's a clear reference. And Harry is the Sith Lord in the scene. He has likened himself to Darth Vader in the past. And like Vader, his emotions often get the benefit of him and he is prepared to meet out harsh vengeance on those he believes are evil and have wronged him. Like Anakin, he is almost always prepared to do whatever he has to and ally with whoever he has to in order to "save" those he loves. It's a classic trope.

And Uriel and Heaven know this. Hence why they intervene so often, as Harry is so important.

On a Doylist level, Jim is also trying to show that Harry can grow and change. Younger Harry would have killed Rudolph. But older Harry is starting to realise that he needs to think a bit further about consequences. Particularly at his most emotional moments. He's trying to make better choices. And Jim can't have Harry murder people all the time, even if it seems justified. If you read the short story the Warrior, it does a good job of showing why giving in to the darker impulses isn't such a good idea. Harry won't be a saint any time soon, but he can try and do better, which is all anyone can really do.
« Last Edit: April 26, 2022, 07:08:25 AM by Yuillegan »
Hi, I'm a moderator. We're here to help. Please remain calm. Don't go outdoors.

Offline Arjan

  • Seriously?
  • ***
  • Posts: 13235
    • View Profile
Re: Battle ground questions
« Reply #22 on: April 26, 2022, 09:14:57 AM »
Here's a logical syllogism.

If Butcher says the sword can only work against evil.
and it works against Harry
Then Harry was evil when the sword struck.

Seems clear enough. Take it up with the angel in the sword or Butcher, whichever you run across first.Neither was Lucifer unless you are saying that Harry was possessed or has picked up a coin again.
The sword can only work against the swords definition of evil. Now you get into the discussion if absolute evil exist and if there is absolute morality.

Some religions tell us that there is absolute morality but in practice moralities in different cultures differ.
WG+++: The White God is Mister.
SH[Elaine+++]

Offline Mira

  • Needs A Life
  • ***
  • Posts: 24359
    • View Profile
Re: Battle ground questions
« Reply #23 on: April 26, 2022, 02:21:46 PM »
The sword can only work against the swords definition of evil. Now you get into the discussion if absolute evil exist and if there is absolute morality.

Some religions tell us that there is absolute morality but in practice moralities in different cultures differ.

We are told over and over again that the Knights and along with them presumably are about redemption, not judgement, that is left up to the ultimate Judge.  The Sword gave Harry a serious warning that what he was about to do is evil, and Harry came to his senses.  It stopped him from doing something evil, just as Harry had stopped Michael.   

Offline morriswalters

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 2547
    • View Profile
Re: Battle ground questions
« Reply #24 on: April 26, 2022, 02:44:56 PM »
The sword can only work against the swords definition of evil. Now you get into the discussion if absolute evil exist and if there is absolute morality.

Some religions tell us that there is absolute morality but in practice moralities in different cultures differ.
I'm not interested in the concept of absolute morality.  I'm interested in what Butcher wrote.  And he states it explicitly.

Offline Arjan

  • Seriously?
  • ***
  • Posts: 13235
    • View Profile
Re: Battle ground questions
« Reply #25 on: April 26, 2022, 03:52:45 PM »
I'm not interested in the concept of absolute morality.  I'm interested in what Butcher wrote.  And he states it explicitly.
From the swords point of view. I think Jim uses both concepts.
WG+++: The White God is Mister.
SH[Elaine+++]

Offline Mira

  • Needs A Life
  • ***
  • Posts: 24359
    • View Profile
Re: Battle ground questions
« Reply #26 on: April 26, 2022, 07:28:04 PM »
From the swords point of view. I think Jim uses both concepts.

Well, we know what happens when the person wielding the Sword breaks the rule about giving the opposition a chance to surrender and repenting.  The Sword breaks, Jim has been very clear about that from the beginning.  As in Harry didn't understand why Michael and Sanya let Cassius go after he gave up his coin. They explained that their business was enabling redemption not punishment.  Harry then handed out some punishment, Sanya agreed with his sentiments, but he did not break the rule of the Sword.

Offline g33k

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 2376
    • View Profile
Re: Battle ground questions
« Reply #27 on: April 26, 2022, 08:31:51 PM »
... Another thing to note is that we actually don't know that Marcone had no magical talent prior. According to Jim, any human can learn magic. Namshiel clearly helped Marcone fast-track, and Marcone is FAR more driven and organised than Harry, so I can imagine he has spent far more time developing than Harry has in recent years (given Harry has been on the back foot and learning on the go for the same period). But suppose for a second Marcone actually has always had magical talent. It would change everything. I mean, he knew EXACTLY what a soul gaze was in Storm Front. He actually got the better of Harry in that moment. And if you examine the language that Jim uses with Marcone over the years he often says things like "He pulled out a knife so fast it appeared as if by magic" and such. This is a writing technique. Now he might be just saying Marcone is exceptionally quick. But considering how often he has said that...it is quite possible he was hinting Marcone was actually magically inclined. It's a reinforcement/foreshadowing thing. And Marcone works in the shadows, unlike Harry. He would make damn sure most don't know about that hidden talent. It's an ace up the sleeve. Think about how long he managed to keep his status as a Knight of the Blackened Denarius secret, that he was the bearer of Thorned Namshiel's Coin. 

Hmm.  Did Harry ever shake hands (or otherwise have skin/skin contact, including a slap or a punch or etc?) with Marcone?  He rescued Marcone a couple of times; did it happen then?

I don't actually recall any such...

I was going to disagree with you, but... this element suggests you may be correct.  I expect Marcone has a good enough "read" on Harry to know Harry would find "handshake from a crime-lord" offensive (and therefore would do so!) ... unless he was protecting this particular secret.

I mean, the case for "Marcone was always a practitioner" is hardly proven!  But it looks like a solid, credible theory.

(Add in the "corpsetaker" facts, (a) that she was looking for a "suitable" body to be able to properly express her own talents, & (b) that Luccio couldn't make swords in the new body (even though it apparently had SOME magical talent, or the corpsetaker wouldn't have been wearing it).  So Marcone having (at least some) inherent talent seems a likely explanation for Namshiel being able to so quickly do the power-up.


... It's no accident that Jim wrote the Jedi-Sith moment with Harry firing lightning at Butters (like a Sith) and Butter's using his Fidelacchius (in lightsabre form) to deflect it - it's a clear reference. And Harry is the Sith Lord in the scene ... 
... And Harry is the Sith Lord in the scene. He has likened himself to Darth Vader in the past. And like Vader, his emotions often get the benefit of him and he is prepared to meet out harsh vengeance on those he believes are evil and have wronged him ...
I feel stupid now...
I hadn't put these two in conjunction before.
TYVM!
« Last Edit: April 26, 2022, 08:37:03 PM by g33k »

Offline Conspiracy Theorist

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 2981
    • View Profile
Re: Battle ground questions
« Reply #28 on: April 26, 2022, 09:15:32 PM »
There there, Harry used green gold lightening, it put you off.

Offline Fcrate

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 1103
    • View Profile
Re: Battle ground questions
« Reply #29 on: April 26, 2022, 09:25:59 PM »
@Yuillegan: #6: exactly. Harry has killed a lot of people. In dead beat he shot Luccio in the back of her head, and killed the Denarian in cold blood, he was no threat, but he killed him as punishment. And Uriel indirectly condoned it later on by saying that he sent an incipient knight of the cross for help.
The point is, the emotional reaction after getting burned by the sword is not very believable. It might have been if Harry was a normal man, and a pacifist and perhaps a member of PETA, but even a normal man who's never killed before won't be crying in shame, he'll be furious, but maybe understanding that he's either beaten and can't get on with the task or that it's morally wrong, so he'll grudgingly concede and maybe skullstomp the killer a little bit.
But Harry is not normal now, is he?@ Mira: Didn't Marcone pull him out of the water in Death Masks? They've had so much contact with each other, and been in a lot of fights together.
Edit: I think Luccio's block is mental, not physical. Corpsetaker seems able to efficiently use his magic regardless of the body. At least in dead beat. In ghost story that changed a bit, but he still said that it was "workable".
« Last Edit: April 26, 2022, 09:29:50 PM by Fcrate »
هل أخذت الغاب مثلي منزلاً دون القصور
فتتبعت السواقي وتسلقت الصخور
هل تحممت بعطره وتنشفت بنور
وشربت الفجر خمراً من كؤوس من أثير