Author Topic: Rudolph's evidence doesn't make sense  (Read 12342 times)

Offline Bad Alias

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 2208
    • View Profile
Re: Rudolph's evidence doesn't make sense
« Reply #60 on: October 01, 2020, 06:52:16 PM »
I finally got it yesterday. Does anyone else think that maybe Rudolph wasn't in anyone's pocket, but he was just pathological about everything bad/supernatural that happened to him was Harry and Murph's fault? Rudolph was a political weasel. He could have enough pull to take the case. We've seen that sort of thing before in the books.

Also, will Rudolph get (mortal) justice? Only Harry saw him murder Murph.

Offline BrainFireBob

  • Conversationalist
  • **
  • Posts: 434
    • View Profile
Re: Rudolph's evidence doesn't make sense
« Reply #61 on: October 01, 2020, 06:58:06 PM »
Bradley.

There's no body and no proof. But Bradley.

Offline Bad Alias

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 2208
    • View Profile
Re: Rudolph's evidence doesn't make sense
« Reply #62 on: October 02, 2020, 07:16:25 PM »
Last Bradley saw Rudolph, he was unconscious.

Offline Mira

  • Needs A Life
  • ***
  • Posts: 24350
    • View Profile
Re: Rudolph's evidence doesn't make sense
« Reply #63 on: October 02, 2020, 07:24:42 PM »

  I predict a great fricking trial short story... Harry will be on trial for Harvey's murder..  Harry's defense lawyer will be Mab, she will put Rudolph on the stand and produce such a Perry Mason moment that Netflix will pester her for the movie rights after the acquittal.