Nowadays it's rare for people to have more than three. Most everyone stops at 2, even though they start early. But that's an economy thing.
My parents had 5, but their generation was different.
You made the right decision though. Personally I believe 2 are enough. 3 at most, as we have to think about our planet.
Yeah, I told myself that a third child wouldn't be practical anyway. We would need a bigger car. Our bedroom downstairs would be too small for all the baby stuff. We moved downstairs so that each girl could have their own room. Luxury, I know, but we actually bought that house because there was this option. Before it became our bedroom, it was my husband's father's room, who was officially living with us. Though he spent most of his time with his girlfriend at her home, lol.
Also I would have to stay at home again. And having a job and having more children is more complicated. At one time in the future you have them in three different institutions, at least with our age difference. One in kindergarten, one in elementary school and one in whatever next school she goes. I already tend to get confused with all the stuff they need for two different institutions and all the dates, meetings and deadlines they have combined with my shift schedule, the grandparents' schedules and my husband's.
In hindsight I am glad that we didn't try it. Though I always was convinced, that I would once have a son. Maybe because there are not so many girls in our family.
So I told myself it was a completely logical and practical decision. And I'm OK with it now, though I am sometimes getting sad, when I see families with three kids.
But honestly, once you know what it is like to care for a baby or two, you can enjoy holding babies of other mothers and give them back as soon as they start crying. It would be weird to do that with your own child. Just imagine: hey you, hold that please, it is crying.