With another Cowl debate, and rehashing of the Simon=Cowl theory, I had to rethink things.
Upon rereading Cowl's scenes I noticed a few things that were interesting.
If we take away the Wizard aspect of his character, we have only a few features to identify him. I have done this to open up the scope of investigation.
Features:- He hides his face and masks his voice. In all probability his scent and perhaps even his magical signature.
- But his sentences are not all that archaic for a Necromancer who should be well over 100 years old (if we assume he trained under Kemmler). We also know that he is reasonably aware of mortal technology and intelligent enough to disrupt it.
- Not only are his sentences fairly modern, but they are skilled. They have the fluency of a native speaker. You can tell this in his choice of expression and use of phrases.
- If he has an accent, he clearly masks that as well.
Goals:- To end the White Council. This is obvious - he seems to view it as weak, corrupt and inefficient. He also hates its restrictions.
- To bring about a New World Order. Presumably one where Wizards can do as they like. Probably also one where he is a ruling entity.
- To end Death. We only know this from Kumori, and he could be leading her on. Still though, perhaps he hates that mortals are mortal. Mortals are also hated by the supernatural in general, particularly the Dragons and the Fallen. But also the Outsiders. Perhaps one or more of those groups tie in. Curiously, a certain Titan also wishes to do the same thing.
- To unbalance the various supernatural organizations and beings. While never stated, he does seem to be behind a lot of the upsets.
- Other, unknown goals. His sidekick says to Dresden "You know very little of him and his goals" (paraphrasing)
Personality- He is arrogant and has a slightly short temper. He is also proud enough to feel distain for his peers and former master (Kemmler).
- He seems to be well educated and fairly formal in his diction. He is self-aware enough to question his own sanity and his cause.
- He doesn't negotiate for long, he proceeds quickly to force.
- He out-thinks his opponents (where possible) and tends to watch-and-wait rather than smash everything blindly. He also reasonably assess his opponents abilities. He wouldn't enter a tactical contest with an opponent he can beat by other, safer methods - his ego isn't out of proportion.
- He is comfortable using swords, but also guns
- He is more similar to Dresden than Dresden would like. He doesn't shirk hard work.
So if we discount magic and open it up to include non-magicians as well then there are a few candidates who become more interesting.
1. Nicodemus ArcheleoneFeatures and personality are similar. It falls down when you try an explain why he has never openly used sorcery (when it clearly would have benefited him). However his goals are somewhat in line, and his sidekick (Deidre) says a similar thing to Kumori about his goals.
2. Gentlemen Johnny MarconeMuch the same as Nicodemus, but the same flaws too. But the mmost difficult reason to reconcile is his association with Mab and Vadderung, which Cowl seems to be against.
3. Arthur LangtryLangtry has the right features and personality, but goals are completely different. He also has the White Council to serve him. He doesn't want it to end. Not to mention his hatred of Peabody when Peabody is revealed.
4. CristosRight features, except perhaps the English. But that's hard to tell at this stage. The goals may well line up. But what's difficult is the personality. He could be a fool, or acting the fool as cover.
5. Father ForthillThe hardest and most interesting candidate. One that most wouldn't see coming. He has the right features, I think. But he also seems a bit working class for Cowl. And he seems to have aided Harry against his best interests, and has had multiple chances to take out Harry or his allies. Still, his status as one of the most trusworthy characters makes him an excellent hidden foe. And it matches up with A Night in the Lonsome October.
And some who make less sense:
1. Simon
Simon's accent is Russian. Beyond that, his writings in the Paranet Papers (admittedly not written by Jim) have him speak in relatively broken English. He also would have learnt it a century ago, and like most Wizards would have been fairly blunt. The way he writes speaks to a fairly cautious, yet blunt and angry wizard. He makes sense as the traitor for his power and knowledge and placement, and in some sense some of his views. But the character of Cowl seems very differnt.
On a separate note, Wizard Montjoy is a character of interest. Aside from his research trip in the heart of the Red Court, Montjoy is also the name of a messenger character in Shakespeare's Henry V. He conveys rather blunt messages from his lord (Charles VI, King of France) to Henry V (King of England). He does it so politely that Henry ends up liking him.
