@Mr. Death
Fair enough about the dinner. Although I’m not so sure that Nic trusts anyone, including Deedee. He is also ruthless & sociopathic, so he probably didn’t want the responsibility of raising a child.
That's belied by the fact that he obviously
did raise a child, Deirdre. I don't see any support in the books for the idea that Nic wouldn't want to raise a child -- it's not like he's without time or resources.
If you remember what Nic tells Harry about why he didn’t help Cassius after the events of DM - it’s because he didn’t want to “help” Cassius, since that would make Snakeboy a parasite who needs Nic’s largesse to thrive & that would be unfair to Cassius - a truly sociopathic line of reasoning. This is towards someone he has known for at least a few centuries.
Totally different situation -- that was
after Cassius had proven that he wasn't up to snuff, and was trying to get back the only real power he'd ever had. Cassius wasn't his child, adopted or otherwise.
In Skin Game, Nic orchestrates a false conflict to get Michael away from Deidre because he is afraid that talking to Michael would make Deedee change her mind. While he clearly loves her, he loves his convoluted end goals more since he sacrifices her to pass the Blood Gate - despite running a fanatical cult where members are proud to have their tongues cut off. He could not trust any of them to kill themselves for him, & he didn’t fully trust that his daughter would go through with it either. Not to mention the incestous undertones in their relationship - ranother thing reminiscent of Lord Raith.
And would he have trusted her
more if he'd let someone else raise her
without instilling her in the values Nic wanted, and without her knowing he even existed until well into her adulthood?
The way Nic probably saw it, Thomas did not turn out to be exceptionally magical or Starborn so there was no guarantee that it would work on Harry either. After all, Maggie married a commoner with no talent (Malcolm), so why would Nic want to raise a potential dud? He has no use for such responsibilities, just as he thought when Cassius lost his coin he was of no further use to him.
I think you're really overselling how much of a burden raising a kid would be for Nic. And if he's a dud? Kill him or make him a squire. The man is 2,000 years old. 10-15 raising a kid is nothing to him.
@Avernite
Dunno, there’s no guarantee that raising Harry will make him turn out to be like Deidre - if that were the case, Harry wouldn’t have rebelled as seriously against Justin (Elaine didn’t). Or that Harry would be more drawn the magically talented Tessa (opp of Deedee). Maybe Nic has had hundreds of kids over the last 2 millennia & Deidre is the only one who survived.
You know what absolutely guarantees that Harry won't turn out like Deirdre?
Not being raised by Nic.
My point does not hinge on trust issues between biological father & daughter over centuries - why would Nic treat Harry as a son?? The reason I brought up Nic’s callous treatment of Cassius is because child or not, Nic would put Harry in that category, not the same as his own flesh & blood....
Because if he treated Harry like a son, he could more easily mold and manipulate him.
How Nicodemus treats Cassius is irrelevant. Nicodemus never would have had any reason to treat Cassius like or think of him as a son.
AND besides, Nic doesn’t know if Harry got any gifts from his mother - & won’t until the latter comes of age around puberty. So Nic would have to raise/ indoctrinate a child from 0-14/15 even though there is a high likelihood that kid will turn out like Thomas or worse (barely magical & not Starborn). Not a great bet from his angle - easier to let someone else raise Harry & then corrupt him through logic/ lies/ Coin.
Again, the "time wasted" element is meaningless for a man who's immortal and well over 2,000 years old. If Harry turns out to not have any magical potential, it would be trivially easy for Nic to either kill him (he's always got a use for human sacrifice) or make him one of the Squires.