No, she doesn't, she sees the externals, but because she bases it all on what she used to know about Harry, and lectures him as to why isn't he like that now and how concerned his friends are that he isn't like he used to be, she is clueless... She doesn't ask questions nor does she really listen to him.. Murphy in truth is a very closed minded person, not saying she is bad, but she has her ideas and stands by them. That is what I think has driven me away from the character, it is like knowing your eleven year old, and thinking the same formula/lecture will work when he or she is twenty-five and has lived in the world... This is how she treats Harry... The biggest proof is what happened with the Sword after what she told Harry, that speaks volumes about her not trusting him on so many levels in spite of her love for him.
That is manifestly not true based on Murphy's behavior in the books. Nothing you said in that graph is at all reflected in what Murphy has said or done in recent books.
We've gone over this before. Repeatedly. Murphy displays an enormous amount of trust in Harry during the books and is repeatedly and consistently shown to ask Harry things and listen to what he has to say. That is literally her major function in the books, so saying she never does so is completely at odds with reality and is therefore baseless, needless bashing.
The actions and attitudes you're ascribing to Murphy are simply not in evidence in the books. This is exactly what I was talking about on the first page of this thread.
You are not in any way describing Murphy. The character you're describing does not exist in the books.
The character you're describing would not have offered to follow Harry into Hades surrounded by some of the worst people and creatures on the planet. She would not have risked her life for him. She would not have offered him her bed when he needed test.
The character you're describing would have done none of the things Murphy did.
