The problem with this is that for most people, this is stuff that they simply can't comprehend, and even if they do, it's on a purely intellectual level. Which is fine for doing science, but magic always has an emotional component, and that's very hard to generate with this set of "elements".
For example, you could try to envision gravity as a quantum entanglement of the 11 dimensions bound by a string of infinite universes in a Möbius strip to do your spells. Or you could envision it as things fall down, the ground is down, the ground is made of earth, therefore earth is my mnemonic device for gravity.
Because, like a lot of other stuff, that's all they are, things to help your brain shape a spell in a way you want it. If you have to think about moving around energy, it's going to be hard, because that's a hard concept to visualize. If you imagine "fire", that's a hell of a lot easier to do. And with the 4 elements, you've got the basics of what you might want to do covered, especially if you give them a more abstract component as well, like entropy and water.
Now that's not to say that your system can't work, but you'd have to make a strong case for why your wizard has an easier time using a system like that to shape his spells than pretty much anything easier. Especially if you start out as a young apprentice, you have no chance of grasping those concepts in the first place. But linking the elements to concepts is easy. Wind is moving air, we've all felt a strong headwind at least once, you can work with those experiences and funnel them into your spells. You don't have anything like that for physics magic based on what you proposed.
Now a few things I could still see work. Gravity would be one of them. Electricity would be another. I would split electromagnetic forces into electricity and magnetism, incidentally, because again, it's easier to grasp. After that, Light could be another thing. Sure, it's electromagnetic waves again, and you can use it for that, radiation, infrared, etc., but as a fundamental concept, it's easier to take light and stretch the wavelength than to come up with radio waves on the spot.
I would leave the atomic forces right out. That's way way above anything you can reasonably shape into a usable thought, I think.