Author Topic: Red Court Infected - Feeding but not killing?  (Read 4447 times)

Offline Tedronai

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 2343
  • Damane
    • View Profile
Re: Red Court Infected - Feeding but not killing?
« Reply #15 on: May 14, 2013, 02:38:57 AM »
Is there an official ruling on this?

There is not.

Your suggested houserules have a few potential problems.  Notably, basing the benefits of the amount of time spent feeding rather than the amount of feeding accomplished in that time punishes characters for being good at what they do.
Even Chaotic Neutral individuals have to apologize sometimes. But at least we don't have to mean it.
Slough

Offline ReaderAt2046

  • Participant
  • *
  • Posts: 78
    • View Profile
Re: Red Court Infected - Feeding but not killing?
« Reply #16 on: May 14, 2013, 12:18:41 PM »
There is not.

Your suggested houserules have a few potential problems.  Notably, basing the benefits of the amount of time spent feeding rather than the amount of feeding accomplished in that time punishes characters for being good at what they do.

Good point. Hmm... Maybe regenerate based on consequences inflicted? (1 for minor, 2 for moderate, etc)

Offline Mr. Death

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 7965
  • Not all those who wander are lost
    • View Profile
    • The C-Team Podcast
Re: Red Court Infected - Feeding but not killing?
« Reply #17 on: May 14, 2013, 04:11:27 PM »
Good point. Hmm... Maybe regenerate based on consequences inflicted? (1 for minor, 2 for moderate, etc)
At one point I proposed something like this...I'll see if I can dig out the thread.
Compels solve everything!

http://blur.by/1KgqJg6 My first book: "Brothers of the Curled Isles"

Quote from: Cozarkian
Not every word JB rights is a conspiracy. Sometimes, he's just telling a story.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_T_mld7Acnm-0FVUiaKDPA The C-Team Podcast