Would you mind telling me what your point was?
My point is very similar to that which Ms Duck and you are arguing.
Why is it what it is? What are the qualifications? What are the reasons? Granted, I was rambling a bit, I do that a lot, but still.
'Fae are weak to iron because they are Fae' is a statement that needs qualification, and you qualified it, but it does not answer whether Fae existed before they were weak to Iron; or if they did exist before then, were they still Sidhe?
Just like you too are arguing whether or not so-and-so is a god based on unknown and assumed qualifications. (Though In that case, I blame Jahovah for claiming exclusive licencing on the title of 'God'. Few Religious figures were ever that ballsy. How about use the word 'deity' so you don't get His panties in a twist, Eh?) Ms Duck is extrapolating data, and the Count is taking the conservative approach.