Scions, half-breeds, and Catches

[Ghsdkgb]

Let's say I have a character with Inhuman Toughness or Recovery, and their Catch is a certain breed of creature (like Outsiders or Fae or Demons or whatever)

Would a Scion or Changeling fulfill that catch? Like, if it's Outsiders (which fan theories indicate the Uber-ghouls from White Night presumably are), would ordinary Ghouls fill it? Or if it's Fae, would a Changeling fill it?

It's kind of a gray area, and a current point of contention in our campaign. Opinions abound!

[wyvern]

Hm.  Depends on a variety of factors, including the actual rebate value of the catch, metaphysical details for your particular game, etc.

For my perspective, the overall answer is "maybe".  For your specific examples, I'd say no to ordinary ghouls (I also don't think the uber-ghouls are outsider-empowered - but even if they are, there's no reason to think that would pass on to their lesser brethren), but yes to changelings, since they are inherently part fae.

Your third comment seems to about sum it up.  It's a grey area.  Opinions will, indeed, abound.  Worst comes to worst, resolve it via a compel - if accepted, PC is vulnerable to X for this scene (or this game session, or whatever seems appropriate); if bought off, not.  And then you can have fun trying to figure out why, say, only some changelings count as fae for your catch.

[UmbraLux]

I'd say it could.  You might want some scions or half-breeds to invoke their high concept (or whatever relates them to the other species) if their relationship isn't obvious.  If it is obvious, I wouldn't require the invoke. 

[Haru]

How about this: if the scion or changeling uses any of his supernatural powers for an attack, the catch is met. If not, then not.

One question that remains is weapons. Is it a catch like the nazgul king, that he "can only be beaten by a woman", then it would translate through a weapon. If the catch is the touch of the creature in question, then of course it would not.

[Ghsdkgb]

How about this: if the scion or changeling uses any of his supernatural powers for an attack, the catch is met. If not, then not.

Most of the supernatural powers are just claws and teeth, though.

I kind of like the idea of buying it off with a compel, personally. Though how that'd work long-term is iffy; maybe I'll just give him a fate point every time these guys come up, if we agree to let them satisfy the Catch? After all, if they satisfy it now, there's no reason they wouldn't in the future.

[sinker]

Oddly enough this reminds me of Fred's statements on the cold iron thread that someone Necro-ed literally yesterday. That magic ebbs and flows, so it's tough to say "You must be this percentage of something to qualify." I like this answer because it backs up the one I'd go for and that is that it meets that catch when it's better for the story. Of course it's tough for some players when there is no clear and predictable system, so I'd probably couple that idea with the whole compel/invoke idea.

[UmbraLux]

To be clear, I was talking about having the NPC invoke his own aspect / high concept rather than compelling the PC.  Though either probably works.

[sqlcowboy]

Hi, the player in question here   I agreed to abide by the general consensus here though.

My argument on Ghouls is that they breed true, so that means they're more natural than unnatural (I'll give that in our game they qualify as Outsiders), if that makes sense to folks.  That's why I brought up the question in the first place.

Can two Changelings have a Changeling kid or would it be a human?  That'd be an interesting twist... and does that mean they are more human or more fae?

[polkaneverdies]

Ghouls are a different species than über ghouls. They aren't really scions anymore because as the last post pointed out they breed true (clans). In my opinion it  would be more appropriate to think of the ubers as an ancestor rather than a parent.

[wyvern]

Can two Changelings have a Changeling kid or would it be a human?  That'd be an interesting twist... and does that mean they are more human or more fae?

Well, it depends on why they're having a kid.  Remember, the choice can be made based on actions rather than deliberate choice - so two changelings deciding to settle down and have a family?  Poof, all are human.  One of them doing this for future power & influence, or maybe even just immediate gratification?  Poof, that one's fae, and the kid is a changeling.  Grey area?  They could still be changelings, and the kid would be too, imo.  It's all wibbley wobbley; go with whatever makes the most sense for the plot, or see if any PCs want to spend fate points on declarations.

[devonapple]

A pregnant Changeling would be a very interesting roleplaying study. The outcome of which I think the players would best determine.

My stance would be that the stress of the pregnancy would sooner or later force the Changeling to make The Choice. The stress of carrying it to term, let alone going through childbirth, may drive a Changeling mom-to-be to think real hard about the advantages of timeless magical Fairy medicine, versus that of modern mortal medicine.

And then, what of the baby if the Changeling chooses Fae?

[UmbraLux]

My argument on Ghouls is that they breed true, so that means they're more natural than unnatural (I'll give that in our game they qualify as Outsiders), if that makes sense to folks.  That's why I brought up the question in the first place.

I'm not sold on the idea of ghouls as Outsiders personally.  I think they're more along the lines of necromantically twisted* human stock.  That said, if ghouls are created / powered by Outsiders in your setting, I'd simply have them invoke their high concept for effect to meet a catch of "Outsider" for a scene.  That fate point would come from a limited supply the NPCs earn, not from the bottomless GM supply.

*Going more from legend and fable than DF novels.  YMMV.

Can two Changelings have a Changeling kid or would it be a human?  That'd be an interesting twist... and does that mean they are more human or more fae?

Sure, why not?  I don't see changeling status as being percentage based...it's about the Choice.  So even a 1/4 fae might end up choosing full fae status at some point.

[Becq]

Regarding the original question, I have a question back: How did you price your Catch (particularly the access portion of it)?  After all, that tells you how rarely to expect to see an attack that qualifies.

If you gave it the +0 option (only a couple of people in the universe have access), then it seems reasonable that only a very restrictive definition applies.  In the case of "Outsider" as a Catch, probably only the attacks of an honest-to-God Outsider (ex: He Who Walks Behind) would count.  For story purposes, you might also claim that a (exceedingly rare!) Item of Power -- crafted by an Outside, infused with its essence, and wielded by a loyal believer of that Outsider -- would count.  On the other hand, if you gave it a +2 for accessibility (anyone could reasonably get access), then you need to lower the bar enough to make that statement accurate.  In the case of an "Outsider" Catch, this probably means that anything touched by Outsider power would have to qualify.  So, for example, the Outsider equivalent of "holy water", or any item "sanctified" in a ritual using Outsider magic.  In between, +1 would probably cover attacks made using Outsider magic, or any attacks by a creature "of Outsider blood", including Scions.

By the way, the rarity of the creature plays a role, here, too.  Fae are much more common, so the above changes a bit.  The +0 option would probably have to be limited to attacks made by one of the Fae Queens themselves, for example.

At least, that's the way I would look at it.

Switching gears for a moment, where does this "Ghouls = Outsider Scion" stuff originate from?  I can't recall anything that would indicate that they have Outsider blood or are otherwise related to Outsiders, but perhaps I'm missing a reference somewhere.  I know there is the theory presented in OW that 'mundane' Ghouls are Scions of Uber-Ghouls, but beyond that I'm coming up blank.  I almost got the impression from what sqlcowboy was saying that "Outsider" was being used as a stand-in for "supernatural" (otherwise I have no idea what "breeding true" has to do with it).

[Ghsdkgb]

Switching gears for a moment, where does this "Ghouls = Outsider Scion" stuff originate from?  I can't recall anything that would indicate that they have Outsider blood or are otherwise related to Outsiders, but perhaps I'm missing a reference somewhere.  I know there is the theory presented in OW that 'mundane' Ghouls are Scions of Uber-Ghouls, but beyond that I'm coming up blank.  I almost got the impression from what sqlcowboy was saying that "Outsider" was being used as a stand-in for "supernatural" (otherwise I have no idea what "breeding true" has to do with it).

That's mostly fan-theory, that the Uber-ghouls are Outsiders, because of how Harry (and Lash) handled the conflict at the end of White Night

[Becq]

You mean because they

(click to show/hide)

entered the fight via a portal from the Nevernever

?  If so, consider that

(click to show/hide)

Marcone's folks did too

.

I tried to look for some discussion on Ghouls and Outsiders, but if there was one, I can't find it.  (Though the search engine here hates me, so that might not mean anything.)