« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Fairness of a House Rule  (Read 1496 times)

Offline ways and means

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 1783
  • What Lies in the Truth, what truth in the Lies.
    • View Profile
Fairness of a House Rule
« on: September 15, 2011, 06:28:50 PM »
I was wondering if anyone in their games had house ruled that control focuses/specialisations only affected control of a spell rather than both control and the attack roll? Do people think it would nurf wizards too much? 
« Last Edit: September 15, 2011, 06:31:48 PM by ways and means »
Logged
Every night has its day.
Even forever must come to an end....
I think.

Offline sinker

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 2115
    • View Profile
Re: Fairness of a House Rule
« Reply #1 on: September 15, 2011, 06:46:51 PM »
I don't think that would be terrible if you were looking for a way to nerf wizards, and as far as I can tell it wouldn't have far reaching consequences.

Make sure your table is all good with it though.
Logged

Offline Sanctaphrax

  • White Council
  • Seriously?
  • ****
  • Posts: 12405
    • View Profile
Re: Fairness of a House Rule
« Reply #2 on: September 15, 2011, 07:09:26 PM »
Logged

Offline InFerrumVeritas

  • Conversationalist
  • **
  • Posts: 813
    • View Profile
Re: Fairness of a House Rule
« Reply #3 on: September 16, 2011, 12:10:32 AM »
I would say it can boost both, but only up to the skill cap.  Then it just boosts control.  That way, you're encouraging wizards to have different skill sets and not just throw discipline as their apex every single time.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »