« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5   Go Down

Author Topic: Were-forms that should not be?  (Read 12413 times)

Offline Team8Mum

  • Conversationalist
  • **
  • Posts: 187
    • View Profile
    • Shattered Realities PBW restart
Re: Were-forms that should not be?
« Reply #45 on: May 10, 2011, 06:34:35 PM »
Quote from: MorkaisChosen on May 10, 2011, 06:29:48 PM
Were-Human.
Is that not just some form of Multiple personality disorder?
Logged
I would HATE to be a character in one of the stories I write -
and then there are the days when it looks too much like I AM!

Offline Haru

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 5520
  • Mentally unstable like a fox.
    • View Profile
Re: Were-forms that should not be?
« Reply #46 on: May 10, 2011, 06:42:07 PM »
Hmm, how about some sort of animal-animal-were form. Like a squirrel that can turn into a bear, or a dog that can turn into a canary. Would make for a strange pet to an even stranger wizard  :D
Logged
“Do you not know that a man is not dead while his name is still spoken?”
― Terry Pratchett, Going Postal

Offline Wolfwood2

  • Conversationalist
  • **
  • Posts: 123
    • View Profile
Re: Were-forms that should not be?
« Reply #47 on: May 10, 2011, 07:10:04 PM »
Quote from: Shecky on May 08, 2011, 12:43:13 PM
When it comes to size, remember the weres we've seen in the books - they tended to have the same mass as the untransformed human. It would seem reasonable that that's the easiest transformation; changing mass would have to do something with the "lost" or "gained" mass-energy, and I'd imagine that adds a big level of complexity to the magic involved.

Of course, then YS goes on the have one of the sample characters at the back of the book be a weremouse who drops herself down to mouse size.  I'm sure that was to demonstrate that guidelines like that need not apply to cool folks like the PCs.
Logged

Offline Set Abominae

  • Conversationalist
  • **
  • Posts: 125
  • Give us a kiss.
    • View Profile
Re: Were-forms that should not be?
« Reply #48 on: May 11, 2011, 01:02:58 AM »
For anyone familiar with the WoD games, I always found were-sharks to be insulting. I mean really, real sharks are bad enough, but now we get were-sharks?

Not setting foot within a mile of the coastline.
Logged
No, ma'am. We at the FBI do not have a sense of humor we're aware of. May we come in?

Offline Stormraven

  • Conversationalist
  • **
  • Posts: 529
  • Heading for Left Field at Warp 9
    • View Profile
Re: Were-forms that should not be?
« Reply #49 on: May 11, 2011, 01:33:05 AM »
Were-Unicorn? :)
Logged
I will choose a path that's clear; I will choose Freewill.

The Sorceress Sleuth
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00BGUR81W

Offline wyvern

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 1418
    • View Profile
Re: Were-forms that should not be?
« Reply #50 on: May 11, 2011, 04:06:50 PM »
Were-wolf-were.  You're a person, who can turn into a wolf, who can turn into a (different?) person!  Now that just should not be.

I like the were-unicorn or platypus notions, though.  Might have to use one of 'em sometime.
Logged

Offline SunlessNick

  • Conversationalist
  • **
  • Posts: 188
    • View Profile
Re: Were-forms that should not be?
« Reply #51 on: May 11, 2011, 04:33:32 PM »
Werecoral.
Logged

Offline Shecky

  • Bartender
  • O. M. G.
  • ****
  • Posts: 34672
  • Feh.
    • View Profile
Re: Were-forms that should not be?
« Reply #52 on: May 11, 2011, 04:47:19 PM »
Quote from: Wolfwood2 on May 10, 2011, 07:10:04 PM
Of course, then YS goes on the have one of the sample characters at the back of the book be a weremouse who drops herself down to mouse size.  I'm sure that was to demonstrate that guidelines like that need not apply to cool folks like the PCs.

I think you're assuming more than is written. There's a lot of stuff in the books about the conversation of mass-energy; it would be most reasonable to presume that the mass-energy must be dealt with somehow.
Logged
Official forum rules and precepts; please read: http://www.jimbutcheronline.com/bb/index.php/topic,23096.0.html

Quote from: Stanton Infeld
Well, if you couldn't do that with your bulls***, Leonard, I suspect the lad's impervious.

Offline BumblingBear

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 2123
  • Rawr.
    • View Profile
Re: Were-forms that should not be?
« Reply #53 on: May 11, 2011, 06:10:38 PM »
Were - Gilbert Gottfried.

/thread
Logged
Myself: If I were in her(Murphy's) position, I would have studied my ass off on the supernatural and rigged up special weapons to deal with them.  Murphy on the other hand just plans to overpower bad guys with the angst of her short woman's syndrome and blame all resulting failures on Harry.

Offline ways and means

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 1783
  • What Lies in the Truth, what truth in the Lies.
    • View Profile
Re: Were-forms that should not be?
« Reply #54 on: May 11, 2011, 06:14:47 PM »
Wear-Bear Stare
Wear- Ninja Turtles
Wear- May Fly
« Last Edit: May 11, 2011, 06:17:19 PM by ways and means »
Logged
Every night has its day.
Even forever must come to an end....
I think.

Offline Lanodantheon

  • Conversationalist
  • **
  • Posts: 439
  • A Wizard is as a Wizard does...
    • View Profile
Re: Were-forms that should not be?
« Reply #55 on: May 11, 2011, 07:19:39 PM »
I'm surprised no one's said Were-Rabbit

or Were-Vorpal Rabbit.

As a GM I would probably be leary about a Were-Dinosaur.


Quote from: MorkaisChosen on May 10, 2011, 06:29:48 PM
Were-Human.

A specific Were-human would drive me to violence: Dr. Butters.
Logged
www.obsidianportal.com/campaigns/the-emerald-city  (Nov 2012 Campaign of The Month)

fate-accelerated-star-wars-the-infinite-empire.obsidianportal.com/
(June 2016 Campaign of The Month)

My name is Lanodantheon Thul, Conjure that by your own risk....But first, you have be able to spell it...

Offline Bruce Coulson

  • Conversationalist
  • **
  • Posts: 621
    • View Profile
Re: Were-forms that should not be?
« Reply #56 on: May 11, 2011, 08:13:23 PM »
Sadly, all were-may flies died upon transformation, as all of them were long past the life expectancy of the insect...

Most campaigns don't have the refresh to allow a were-rabbit; you'd need Superhuman Speed, Flight, Claws, at least Inhuman Strength and Stamina, with the catch of Holy Items.
Logged
You're the spirit of a nation, all right.  But it's NOT America.

Offline jadecourtflunky

  • Conversationalist
  • **
  • Posts: 202
  • "You are cattle" "Moo" (blows head off)
    • View Profile
Re: Were-forms that should not be?
« Reply #57 on: May 12, 2011, 01:12:19 AM »
Not just holy items, the holy hand grenade!

In all seriousness, how about a were-mole. Or a were-Pidgeon. Or even a were-(Insert video game character who is also an animal here). Or even worse... sonic the werehog.
Logged

Offline mithrandirthewhite

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 2964
    • View Profile
Re: Were-forms that should not be?
« Reply #58 on: May 12, 2011, 01:53:19 AM »
but then he'd be a pig! :D Now I have an image of a man walking around looking like a Pigman from Minecraft.
Logged
WHAT CAN THE HARVEST HOPE FOR, IF NOT FOR THE CARE OF THE REAPER MAN?

Offline ways and means

  • Posty McPostington
  • ***
  • Posts: 1783
  • What Lies in the Truth, what truth in the Lies.
    • View Profile
Re: Were-forms that should not be?
« Reply #59 on: May 12, 2011, 02:12:48 AM »
Pac Wear or Wear Man
Wear Hare
Wear Jessica Rabit
Wear Donald Dispicable
Logged
Every night has its day.
Even forever must come to an end....
I think.
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5   Go Up
« previous next »