« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: Avatar discussion revisited  (Read 6473 times)

Tbora

  • Guest
Re: Avatar discussion revisited
« Reply #15 on: December 18, 2010, 02:55:06 AM »
it says 125x125 to me.
Logged

Offline Myyrdn Eopia

  • Bartender
  • Posty McPostington
  • ****
  • Posts: 2903
  • Twitter: @myyrdneopia
    • View Profile
    • Ranting Dragon SF/F News and Reviews
Re: Avatar discussion revisited
« Reply #16 on: December 18, 2010, 03:19:44 AM »
Looks like the photobucket image is 125x125.  Did you click "save" when resizing? :D
Logged

Offline Serack

  • Special Collections Division
  • Posty McPostington
  • ****
  • Posts: 7745
  • WoJ Rock Star!
    • View Profile
Re: Avatar discussion revisited
« Reply #17 on: December 18, 2010, 12:12:56 PM »
it fixed itself now.  wonder why there was a delay
Logged
DF WoJ Compilation
Green is my curator voice.
Name dropping "Serack" in a post /will/ draw my attention to it
*gnaws on the collar of his special issue Beta Foo long-sleeved jacket*

Offline Blaze

  • Cloak maker to Wizards.
  • Seriously?
  • ***
  • Posts: 13514
  • Moderator
    • View Profile
Re: Avatar discussion revisited
« Reply #18 on: December 18, 2010, 03:18:24 PM »
And it has lost none of it's impact!
Logged
Chi pò, non vò; chi vò, non pò; chi sà, non fà; chi fà, non sà; e così, male il mondo va.

Offline Blaze

  • Cloak maker to Wizards.
  • Seriously?
  • ***
  • Posts: 13514
  • Moderator
    • View Profile
Re: Avatar discussion revisited
« Reply #19 on: December 24, 2010, 12:06:48 AM »
For the convenience of the board members, we have revised avatar size restriction to 150 x 150 pixels.  Thank you!
Logged
Chi pò, non vò; chi vò, non pò; chi sà, non fà; chi fà, non sà; e così, male il mondo va.
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »