Be careful when you say that. The very small minority could be the two or three vocal people who are dominating a discussion thread with disproportionately excessive posting. No guarantee it ain't you who's wanting the special treatment, in other words.
Ok, here's a question, what's disproportionately excessive posting?
I got up about an hour ago, checked the forums and went through a few pages on the "I hate Susan thread' and I responded to a couple of different points made by different people.
So, yes, I made a large batch posting.
Is that disproportionately excessive?
It's probably worth noting that I'm now a lot more wary about posting in reply to someone who's replied to me, simply because I don't want to be accused of bullying or cutting off debate. I don't like that feeling, it removes a lot of the fun of the forums for me, when I have to double check I haven't post TOO much in a given thread, lest I be considered to be drowning out others.
I don't have any problem with someone starting a new thread and proposing certain "ground rules" for the thread, e.g., "Please avoid posting more than twice in a row in this thread. We're looking to let multiple people weigh in. Further, if any one page on this thread features the same two posters going back and forth, maybe it's time for both of those people to take a break." Or something like that.
If you don't like the ground rules that get set in a thread, start another one with different rules.
Of course I'll follow any ground rules set for a thread, or start my own, but it just seems like people keep making threads on this issue in an attempt to get the rules changed.